Finish writeup
This commit is contained in:
parent
0000049059
commit
0000050087
1 changed files with 27 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -57,14 +57,24 @@ decreases in brightness when all other factors remain constant.
|
|||
|
||||
## Varying $k_d$
|
||||
|
||||
TODO
|
||||
$k_d$ is the strength of the diffuse component. It also affects an object's
|
||||
diffuse color, but at a strength that's affected by how much of it faces the
|
||||
light. Much like the dark side of the moon, the parts of the object that aren't
|
||||
pointed at the light will not receive as much of the light's influence. In the
|
||||
image below, I varied $k_d$ between 0.2 and 1. Note how the part pointed to the
|
||||
light changes the strength of the brightness as all other factors remain
|
||||
constant.
|
||||
|
||||
![Varying $k_d$](examples/kd-demo.png){width=360px}
|
||||
\
|
||||
|
||||
## Varying $k_s$
|
||||
|
||||
TODO
|
||||
$k_s$ is the specular strength. It uses the object's specular color, which is
|
||||
like its reflective component. When there is a large specular $k_s$, there's a
|
||||
shine that appears on the object with a greater intensity. In the image below, I
|
||||
varied $k_s$ between 0.2 and 1. Note how the whiteness of the light is more
|
||||
reflective in higher $k_s$ values as other factors remain constant.
|
||||
|
||||
![Varying $k_s$](examples/ks-demo.png){width=360px}
|
||||
\
|
||||
|
@ -74,7 +84,8 @@ TODO
|
|||
$n$ is the exponent saying how big the radius of the specular highlight should
|
||||
be. In the equation, increasing the exponent usually leads to smaller shines. In
|
||||
the image below, I varied $n$ between 2 and 100. Note how the size of the shine
|
||||
is more focused but covers a smaller area as $n$ increases.
|
||||
is the same intensity, but more focused but covers a smaller area as $n$
|
||||
increases.
|
||||
|
||||
![Varying $n$](examples/n-demo.png){width=360px}
|
||||
\
|
||||
|
@ -142,9 +153,21 @@ are away from the eye.
|
|||
|
||||
## Shortcomings of the model
|
||||
|
||||
The model cannot be used to represent TODO
|
||||
The Phong formula is just a model of how light works, and doesn't actually
|
||||
represent reality. There's not actually rays physically escaping our eyes and
|
||||
hitting objects; it's actually the other way around, but computing it that way
|
||||
would not be efficient since we would be factoring in a lot of rays that don't
|
||||
ever get rendered.
|
||||
|
||||
Also, one needs to take care to use reasonable constants. For example, if using
|
||||
a different specular light color than the diffuse color, then it may produce
|
||||
some bizarre lighting effects that may not actually look right compare to
|
||||
reality.
|
||||
|
||||
# Arbitrary Objects
|
||||
|
||||
Here is an example scene with some objects that demonstrates some of the
|
||||
features of the raytracer.
|
||||
|
||||
![Objects in the scene](examples/objects.png){width=360px}
|
||||
\
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue