Spectral/archive/smash_old.hlean

191 lines
8.1 KiB
Text
Raw Normal View History

2017-03-08 03:31:44 +00:00
/- below are some old tries to compute (A ∧ S¹) directly -/
exit
/- smash A S¹ = red_susp A -/
definition red_susp_of_smash_pcircle [unfold 2] (x : smash A S¹*) : red_susp A :=
begin
induction x using smash.elim,
{ induction b, exact base, exact equator a },
{ exact base },
{ exact base },
{ reflexivity },
{ exact circle_elim_constant equator_pt b }
end
definition smash_pcircle_of_red_susp [unfold 2] (x : red_susp A) : smash A S¹* :=
begin
induction x,
{ exact pt },
{ exact gluel' pt a ⬝ ap (smash.mk a) loop ⬝ gluel' a pt },
{ refine !con.right_inv ◾ _ ◾ !con.right_inv,
exact ap_is_constant gluer loop ⬝ !con.right_inv }
end
definition smash_pcircle_of_red_susp_of_smash_pcircle_pt [unfold 3] (a : A) (x : S¹*) :
smash_pcircle_of_red_susp (red_susp_of_smash_pcircle (smash.mk a x)) = smash.mk a x :=
begin
induction x,
{ exact gluel' pt a },
{ exact abstract begin apply eq_pathover,
refine ap_compose smash_pcircle_of_red_susp _ _ ⬝ph _,
refine ap02 _ (elim_loop pt (equator a)) ⬝ !elim_equator ⬝ph _,
-- make everything below this a lemma defined by path induction?
refine !con_idp⁻¹ ⬝pv _, refine !con.assoc⁻¹ ⬝ph _, apply whisker_bl, apply whisker_lb,
apply whisker_tl, apply hrfl end end }
end
definition concat2o [unfold 10] {A B : Type} {f g h : A → B} {q : f ~ g} {r : g ~ h} {a a' : A}
{p : a = a'} (s : q a =[p] q a') (t : r a =[p] r a') : q a ⬝ r a =[p] q a' ⬝ r a' :=
by induction p; exact idpo
definition apd_con_fn [unfold 10] {A B : Type} {f g h : A → B} {q : f ~ g} {r : g ~ h} {a a' : A}
(p : a = a') : apd (λa, q a ⬝ r a) p = concat2o (apd q p) (apd r p) :=
by induction p; reflexivity
-- definition apd_con_fn_constant [unfold 10] {A B : Type} {f : A → B} {b b' : B} {q : Πa, f a = b}
-- {r : b = b'} {a a' : A} (p : a = a') :
-- apd (λa, q a ⬝ r) p = concat2o (apd q p) (pathover_of_eq _ idp) :=
-- by induction p; reflexivity
definition smash_pcircle_pequiv_red [constructor] (A : Type*) : smash A S¹* ≃* red_susp A :=
begin
fapply pequiv_of_equiv,
{ fapply equiv.MK,
{ exact red_susp_of_smash_pcircle },
{ exact smash_pcircle_of_red_susp },
{ exact abstract begin intro x, induction x,
{ reflexivity },
{ apply eq_pathover, apply hdeg_square,
refine ap_compose red_susp_of_smash_pcircle _ _ ⬝ ap02 _ !elim_equator ⬝ _ ⬝ !ap_id⁻¹,
refine !ap_con ⬝ (!ap_con ⬝ !elim_gluel' ◾ !ap_compose'⁻¹) ◾ !elim_gluel' ⬝ _,
esimp, exact !idp_con ⬝ !elim_loop },
{ exact sorry } end end },
{ intro x, induction x,
{ exact smash_pcircle_of_red_susp_of_smash_pcircle_pt a b },
{ exact gluel pt },
{ exact gluer pt },
{ apply eq_pathover_id_right,
refine ap_compose smash_pcircle_of_red_susp _ _ ⬝ph _,
unfold [red_susp_of_smash_pcircle],
refine ap02 _ !elim_gluel ⬝ph _,
esimp, apply whisker_rt, exact vrfl },
{ apply eq_pathover_id_right,
refine ap_compose smash_pcircle_of_red_susp _ _ ⬝ph _,
unfold [red_susp_of_smash_pcircle],
-- not sure why so many implicit arguments are needed here...
refine ap02 _ (@smash.elim_gluer A S¹* _ (λa, circle.elim red_susp.base (equator a)) red_susp.base red_susp.base (λa, refl red_susp.base) (circle_elim_constant equator_pt) b) ⬝ph _,
apply square_of_eq, induction b,
{ exact whisker_right _ !con.right_inv },
{ apply eq_pathover_dep, refine !apd_con_fn ⬝pho _ ⬝hop !apd_con_fn⁻¹,
refine ap (λx, concat2o x _) !rec_loop ⬝pho _ ⬝hop (ap011 concat2o (apd_compose1 (λa b, ap smash_pcircle_of_red_susp b) (circle_elim_constant equator_pt) loop) !apd_constant')⁻¹,
exact sorry }
}}},
{ reflexivity }
end
/- smash A S¹ = susp A -/
open susp
definition psusp_of_smash_pcircle [unfold 2] (x : smash A S¹*) : psusp A :=
begin
induction x using smash.elim,
{ induction b, exact pt, exact merid a ⬝ (merid pt)⁻¹ },
{ exact pt },
{ exact pt },
{ reflexivity },
{ induction b, reflexivity, apply eq_pathover_constant_right, apply hdeg_square,
exact !elim_loop ⬝ !con.right_inv }
end
definition smash_pcircle_of_psusp [unfold 2] (x : psusp A) : smash A S¹* :=
begin
induction x,
{ exact pt },
{ exact pt },
{ exact gluel' pt a ⬝ (ap (smash.mk a) loop ⬝ gluel' a pt) },
end
-- the definitions below compile, but take a long time to do so and have sorry's in them
definition smash_pcircle_of_psusp_of_smash_pcircle_pt [unfold 3] (a : A) (x : S¹*) :
smash_pcircle_of_psusp (psusp_of_smash_pcircle (smash.mk a x)) = smash.mk a x :=
begin
induction x,
{ exact gluel' pt a },
{ exact abstract begin apply eq_pathover,
refine ap_compose smash_pcircle_of_psusp _ _ ⬝ph _,
refine ap02 _ (elim_loop north (merid a ⬝ (merid pt)⁻¹)) ⬝ph _,
refine !ap_con ⬝ (!elim_merid ◾ (!ap_inv ⬝ !elim_merid⁻²)) ⬝ph _,
-- make everything below this a lemma defined by path induction?
exact sorry,
-- refine !con_idp⁻¹ ⬝pv _, apply whisker_tl, refine !con.assoc⁻¹ ⬝ph _,
-- apply whisker_bl, apply whisker_lb,
-- refine !con_idp⁻¹ ⬝pv _, apply whisker_tl, apply hrfl
-- refine !con_idp⁻¹ ⬝pv _, apply whisker_tl,
-- refine !con.assoc⁻¹ ⬝ph _, apply whisker_bl, apply whisker_lb, apply hrfl
-- apply square_of_eq, rewrite [+con.assoc], apply whisker_left, apply whisker_left,
-- symmetry, apply con_eq_of_eq_inv_con, esimp, apply con_eq_of_eq_con_inv,
-- refine _⁻² ⬝ !con_inv, refine _ ⬝ !con.assoc,
-- refine _ ⬝ whisker_right _ !inv_con_cancel_right⁻¹, refine _ ⬝ !con.right_inv⁻¹,
-- refine !con.right_inv ◾ _, refine _ ◾ !con.right_inv,
-- refine !ap_mk_right ⬝ !con.right_inv
end end }
end
-- definition smash_pcircle_of_psusp_of_smash_pcircle_gluer_base (b : S¹*)
-- : square (smash_pcircle_of_psusp_of_smash_pcircle_pt (Point A) b)
-- (gluer pt)
-- (ap smash_pcircle_of_psusp (ap (λ a, psusp_of_smash_pcircle a) (gluer b)))
-- (gluer b) :=
-- begin
-- refine ap02 _ !elim_gluer ⬝ph _,
-- induction b,
-- { apply square_of_eq, exact whisker_right _ !con.right_inv },
-- { apply square_pathover', exact sorry }
-- end
exit
definition smash_pcircle_pequiv [constructor] (A : Type*) : smash A S¹* ≃* psusp A :=
begin
fapply pequiv_of_equiv,
{ fapply equiv.MK,
{ exact psusp_of_smash_pcircle },
{ exact smash_pcircle_of_psusp },
{ exact abstract begin intro x, induction x,
{ reflexivity },
{ exact merid pt },
{ apply eq_pathover_id_right,
refine ap_compose psusp_of_smash_pcircle _ _ ⬝ph _,
refine ap02 _ !elim_merid ⬝ph _,
rewrite [↑gluel', +ap_con, +ap_inv, -ap_compose'],
refine (_ ◾ _⁻² ◾ _ ◾ (_ ◾ _⁻²)) ⬝ph _,
rotate 5, do 2 (unfold [psusp_of_smash_pcircle]; apply elim_gluel),
esimp, apply elim_loop, do 2 (unfold [psusp_of_smash_pcircle]; apply elim_gluel),
refine idp_con (merid a ⬝ (merid (Point A))⁻¹) ⬝ph _,
apply square_of_eq, refine !idp_con ⬝ _⁻¹, apply inv_con_cancel_right } end end },
{ intro x, induction x using smash.rec,
{ exact smash_pcircle_of_psusp_of_smash_pcircle_pt a b },
{ exact gluel pt },
{ exact gluer pt },
{ apply eq_pathover_id_right,
refine ap_compose smash_pcircle_of_psusp _ _ ⬝ph _,
unfold [psusp_of_smash_pcircle],
refine ap02 _ !elim_gluel ⬝ph _,
esimp, apply whisker_rt, exact vrfl },
{ apply eq_pathover_id_right,
refine ap_compose smash_pcircle_of_psusp _ _ ⬝ph _,
unfold [psusp_of_smash_pcircle],
refine ap02 _ !elim_gluer ⬝ph _,
induction b,
{ apply square_of_eq, exact whisker_right _ !con.right_inv },
{ exact sorry}
}}},
{ reflexivity }
end
end smash