263 lines
9 KiB
Text
263 lines
9 KiB
Text
/-
|
||
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
|
||
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
|
||
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Egbert Rijke
|
||
-/
|
||
|
||
import ..move_to_lib types.fin types.trunc
|
||
|
||
open nat eq equiv sigma sigma.ops is_equiv is_trunc trunc prod fiber
|
||
|
||
namespace seq_colim
|
||
|
||
definition seq_diagram [reducible] (A : ℕ → Type) : Type := Π⦃n⦄, A n → A (succ n)
|
||
|
||
structure Seq_diagram : Type :=
|
||
(carrier : ℕ → Type)
|
||
(struct : seq_diagram carrier)
|
||
|
||
definition is_equiseq [reducible] {A : ℕ → Type} (f : seq_diagram A) : Type :=
|
||
forall (n : ℕ), is_equiv (@f n)
|
||
|
||
structure Equi_seq : Type :=
|
||
(carrier : ℕ → Type)
|
||
(maps : seq_diagram carrier)
|
||
(prop : is_equiseq maps)
|
||
|
||
protected abbreviation Mk [constructor] := Seq_diagram.mk
|
||
attribute Seq_diagram.carrier [coercion]
|
||
attribute Seq_diagram.struct [coercion]
|
||
|
||
variables {A A' : ℕ → Type} (f : seq_diagram A) (f' : seq_diagram A')
|
||
include f
|
||
|
||
definition lrep {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m) (a : A n) : A m :=
|
||
begin
|
||
induction H with m H y,
|
||
{ exact a },
|
||
{ exact f y }
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
definition lrep_irrel_pathover {n m m' : ℕ} (H₁ : n ≤ m) (H₂ : n ≤ m') (p : m = m') (a : A n) :
|
||
lrep f H₁ a =[p] lrep f H₂ a :=
|
||
apo (λm H, lrep f H a) !is_prop.elimo
|
||
|
||
definition lrep_irrel {n m : ℕ} (H₁ H₂ : n ≤ m) (a : A n) : lrep f H₁ a = lrep f H₂ a :=
|
||
ap (λH, lrep f H a) !is_prop.elim
|
||
|
||
definition lrep_eq_transport {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m) (p : n = m) (a : A n) : lrep f H a = transport A p a :=
|
||
begin induction p, exact lrep_irrel f H (nat.le_refl n) a end
|
||
|
||
definition lrep_irrel2 {n m : ℕ} (H₁ H₂ : n ≤ m) (a : A n) :
|
||
lrep_irrel f (le.step H₁) (le.step H₂) a = ap (@f m) (lrep_irrel f H₁ H₂ a) :=
|
||
begin
|
||
have H₁ = H₂, from !is_prop.elim, induction this,
|
||
refine ap02 _ !is_prop_elim_self ⬝ _ ⬝ ap02 _(ap02 _ !is_prop_elim_self⁻¹),
|
||
reflexivity
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
definition lrep_eq_lrep_irrel {n m m' : ℕ} (H₁ : n ≤ m) (H₂ : n ≤ m') (a₁ a₂ : A n) (p : m = m') :
|
||
(lrep f H₁ a₁ = lrep f H₁ a₂) ≃ (lrep f H₂ a₁ = lrep f H₂ a₂) :=
|
||
equiv_apd011 (λm H, lrep f H a₁ = lrep f H a₂) (is_prop.elimo p H₁ H₂)
|
||
|
||
definition lrep_eq_lrep_irrel_natural {n m m' : ℕ} {H₁ : n ≤ m} (H₂ : n ≤ m') {a₁ a₂ : A n}
|
||
(p : m = m') (q : lrep f H₁ a₁ = lrep f H₁ a₂) :
|
||
lrep_eq_lrep_irrel f (le.step H₁) (le.step H₂) a₁ a₂ (ap succ p) (ap (@f m) q) =
|
||
ap (@f m') (lrep_eq_lrep_irrel f H₁ H₂ a₁ a₂ p q) :=
|
||
begin
|
||
esimp [lrep_eq_lrep_irrel],
|
||
symmetry,
|
||
refine fn_tro_eq_tro_fn2 _ (λa₁ a₂, ap (@f _)) q ⬝ _,
|
||
refine ap (λx, x ▸o _) (@is_prop.elim _ _ _ _),
|
||
apply is_trunc_pathover
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
definition is_equiv_lrep [constructor] [Hf : is_equiseq f] {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m) :
|
||
is_equiv (lrep f H) :=
|
||
begin
|
||
induction H with m H Hlrepf,
|
||
{ apply is_equiv_id },
|
||
{ exact is_equiv_compose (@f _) (lrep f H) },
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
local attribute is_equiv_lrep [instance]
|
||
definition lrep_back [reducible] [Hf : is_equiseq f] {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m) : A m → A n :=
|
||
(lrep f H)⁻¹ᶠ
|
||
|
||
section generalized_lrep
|
||
variable {n : ℕ}
|
||
|
||
-- definition lrep_pathover_lrep0 [reducible] (k : ℕ) (a : A 0) : lrep f k a =[nat.zero_add k] lrep0 f k a :=
|
||
-- begin induction k with k p, constructor, exact pathover_ap A succ (apo f p) end
|
||
|
||
/- lreplace le_of_succ_le with this -/
|
||
|
||
definition lrep_f {n m : ℕ} (H : succ n ≤ m) (a : A n) :
|
||
lrep f H (f a) = lrep f (le_step_left H) a :=
|
||
begin
|
||
induction H with m H p,
|
||
{ reflexivity },
|
||
{ exact ap (@f m) p }
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
definition lrep_lrep {n m k : ℕ} (H1 : n ≤ m) (H2 : m ≤ k) (a : A n) :
|
||
lrep f H2 (lrep f H1 a) = lrep f (nat.le_trans H1 H2) a :=
|
||
begin
|
||
induction H2 with k H2 p,
|
||
{ reflexivity },
|
||
{ exact ap (@f k) p }
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
-- -- this should be a squareover
|
||
-- definition lrep_lrep_succ (k l : ℕ) (a : A n) :
|
||
-- lrep_lrep f k (succ l) a = change_path (idontwanttoprovethis n l k)
|
||
-- (lrep_f f k (lrep f l a) ⬝o
|
||
-- lrep_lrep f (succ k) l a ⬝o
|
||
-- pathover_ap _ (λz, n + z) (apd (λz, lrep f z a) (succ_add l k)⁻¹ᵖ)) :=
|
||
-- begin
|
||
-- induction k with k IH,
|
||
-- { constructor},
|
||
-- { exact sorry}
|
||
-- end
|
||
|
||
definition f_lrep {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m) (a : A n) : f (lrep f H a) = lrep f (le.step H) a := idp
|
||
|
||
definition rep (m : ℕ) (a : A n) : A (n + m) :=
|
||
lrep f (le_add_right n m) a
|
||
|
||
definition rep0 (m : ℕ) (a : A 0) : A m :=
|
||
lrep f (zero_le m) a
|
||
|
||
-- definition old_rep (m : ℕ) (a : A n) : A (n + m) :=
|
||
-- by induction m with m y; exact a; exact f y
|
||
|
||
-- definition rep_eq_old_rep (m : ℕ) (a : A n) : rep f m a = old_rep f m a :=
|
||
-- by induction m with m p; reflexivity; exact ap (@f _) p
|
||
|
||
definition rep_f (k : ℕ) (a : A n) :
|
||
pathover A (rep f k (f a)) (succ_add n k) (rep f (succ k) a) :=
|
||
begin
|
||
induction k with k IH,
|
||
{ constructor },
|
||
{ unfold [succ_add], apply pathover_ap, exact apo f IH}
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
definition rep_rep (k l : ℕ) (a : A n) :
|
||
pathover A (rep f k (rep f l a)) (nat.add_assoc n l k) (rep f (l + k) a) :=
|
||
begin
|
||
induction k with k IH,
|
||
{ constructor},
|
||
{ apply pathover_ap, exact apo f IH}
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
end generalized_lrep
|
||
|
||
section shift
|
||
|
||
definition shift_diag [unfold_full] : seq_diagram (λn, A (succ n)) :=
|
||
λn a, f a
|
||
|
||
definition kshift_diag [unfold_full] (k : ℕ) : seq_diagram (λn, A (k + n)) :=
|
||
λn a, f a
|
||
|
||
definition kshift_diag' [unfold_full] (k : ℕ) : seq_diagram (λn, A (n + k)) :=
|
||
λn a, transport A (succ_add n k)⁻¹ (f a)
|
||
|
||
definition lrep_kshift_diag {n m k : ℕ} (H : m ≤ k) (a : A (n + m)) :
|
||
lrep (kshift_diag f n) H a = lrep f (nat.add_le_add_left2 H n) a :=
|
||
by induction H with k H p; reflexivity; exact ap (@f _) p
|
||
|
||
end shift
|
||
|
||
section constructions
|
||
|
||
omit f
|
||
|
||
definition constant_seq (X : Type) : seq_diagram (λ n, X) :=
|
||
λ n x, x
|
||
|
||
definition seq_diagram_arrow_left [unfold_full] (X : Type) : seq_diagram (λn, X → A n) :=
|
||
λn g x, f (g x)
|
||
|
||
definition seq_diagram_prod [unfold_full] : seq_diagram (λn, A n × A' n) :=
|
||
λn, prod_functor (@f n) (@f' n)
|
||
|
||
open fin
|
||
definition seq_diagram_fin [unfold_full] : seq_diagram fin :=
|
||
lift_succ2
|
||
|
||
definition id0_seq [unfold_full] (a₁ a₂ : A 0) : ℕ → Type :=
|
||
λ k, rep0 f k a₁ = lrep f (zero_le k) a₂
|
||
|
||
definition id0_seq_diagram [unfold_full] (a₁ a₂ : A 0) : seq_diagram (id0_seq f a₁ a₂) :=
|
||
λ (k : ℕ) (p : rep0 f k a₁ = rep0 f k a₂), ap (@f k) p
|
||
|
||
definition id_seq [unfold_full] (n : ℕ) (a₁ a₂ : A n) : ℕ → Type :=
|
||
λ k, rep f k a₁ = rep f k a₂
|
||
|
||
definition id_seq_diagram [unfold_full] (n : ℕ) (a₁ a₂ : A n) : seq_diagram (id_seq f n a₁ a₂) :=
|
||
λ (k : ℕ) (p : rep f k a₁ = rep f k a₂), ap (@f (n + k)) p
|
||
|
||
definition trunc_diagram [unfold_full] (k : ℕ₋₂) (f : seq_diagram A) :
|
||
seq_diagram (λn, trunc k (A n)) :=
|
||
λn, trunc_functor k (@f n)
|
||
|
||
end constructions
|
||
|
||
section over
|
||
|
||
variable {A}
|
||
variable (P : Π⦃n⦄, A n → Type)
|
||
|
||
definition seq_diagram_over : Type := Π⦃n⦄ {a : A n}, P a → P (f a)
|
||
|
||
definition weakened_sequence [unfold_full] : seq_diagram_over f (λn a, A' n) :=
|
||
λn a a', f' a'
|
||
|
||
definition id0_seq_diagram_over [unfold_full] (a₀ : A 0) :
|
||
seq_diagram_over f (λn a, lrep f (zero_le n) a₀ = a) :=
|
||
λn a p, ap (@f n) p
|
||
|
||
variable (g : seq_diagram_over f P)
|
||
variables {f P}
|
||
|
||
definition seq_diagram_of_over [unfold_full] {n : ℕ} (a : A n) :
|
||
seq_diagram (λk, P (rep f k a)) :=
|
||
λk p, g p
|
||
|
||
definition seq_diagram_sigma [unfold 6] : seq_diagram (λn, Σ(x : A n), P x) :=
|
||
λn v, ⟨f v.1, g v.2⟩
|
||
|
||
variables {n : ℕ} (f P)
|
||
|
||
theorem rep_f_equiv [constructor] (a : A n) (k : ℕ) :
|
||
P (lrep f (le_add_right (succ n) k) (f a)) ≃ P (lrep f (le_add_right n (succ k)) a) :=
|
||
equiv_apd011 P (rep_f f k a)
|
||
|
||
theorem rep_rep_equiv [constructor] (a : A n) (k l : ℕ) :
|
||
P (rep f (l + k) a) ≃ P (rep f k (rep f l a)) :=
|
||
(equiv_apd011 P (rep_rep f k l a))⁻¹ᵉ
|
||
|
||
end over
|
||
|
||
omit f
|
||
-- do we need to generalize this to the case where the bottom sequence consists of equivalences?
|
||
definition seq_diagram_pi {X : Type} {A : X → ℕ → Type} (g : Π⦃x n⦄, A x n → A x (succ n)) :
|
||
seq_diagram (λn, Πx, A x n) :=
|
||
λn f x, g (f x)
|
||
|
||
variables {f f'}
|
||
definition seq_diagram_over_fiber (g : Π⦃n⦄, A n → A' n)
|
||
(p : Π⦃n⦄ (a : A n), g (f a) = f' (g a)) : seq_diagram_over f' (λn, fiber (@g n)) :=
|
||
λk a, fiber_functor (@f k) (@f' k) (@p k) idp
|
||
|
||
definition seq_diagram_fiber (g : Π⦃n⦄, A n → A' n) (p : Π⦃n⦄ (a : A n), g (f a) = f' (g a))
|
||
{n : ℕ} (a : A' n) : seq_diagram (λk, fiber (@g (n + k)) (rep f' k a)) :=
|
||
seq_diagram_of_over (seq_diagram_over_fiber g p) a
|
||
|
||
definition seq_diagram_fiber0 (g : Π⦃n⦄, A n → A' n) (p : Π⦃n⦄ (a : A n), g (f a) = f' (g a))
|
||
(a : A' 0) : seq_diagram (λk, fiber (@g k) (rep0 f' k a)) :=
|
||
λk, fiber_functor (@f k) (@f' k) (@p k) idp
|
||
|
||
|
||
end seq_colim
|