Fixed module naming typos
This commit is contained in:
parent
63fcbbe25e
commit
3a98d1dbae
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ open import Relation.Nullary using (¬_; Dec; yes; no)
|
|||
Once we have a type derivation, it will be easy to construct
|
||||
from it the intrinsically-typed representation. In order that we
|
||||
can compare with our previous development, we import
|
||||
module `pfla.DeBruijn`:
|
||||
module `plfa.part2.DeBruijn`:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
import plfa.part2.DeBruijn as DB
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1178,7 +1178,7 @@ the empty type `⊥`. If we use C-c C-n to normalise the term
|
|||
|
||||
Agda will return an answer warning us that the impossible has occurred:
|
||||
|
||||
⊥-elim (.plfa.Lambda.impossible "a" "a" refl)
|
||||
⊥-elim (plfa.part2.Lambda.impossible "a" "a" refl)
|
||||
|
||||
While postulating the impossible is a useful technique, it must be
|
||||
used with care, since such postulation could allow us to provide
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue