refactor(library/data): simplify definition of disjoint
This commit is contained in:
parent
ee895e00dd
commit
54a2d9750e
2 changed files with 21 additions and 48 deletions
|
@ -168,24 +168,14 @@ end erase
|
|||
definition disjoint (s₁ s₂ : finset A) : Prop :=
|
||||
quot.lift_on₂ s₁ s₂ (λ l₁ l₂, disjoint (elt_of l₁) (elt_of l₂))
|
||||
(λ v₁ v₂ w₁ w₂ p₁ p₂, propext (iff.intro
|
||||
(λ d₁ a, and.intro
|
||||
(λ ainw₁ : a ∈ elt_of w₁,
|
||||
have ainv₁ : a ∈ elt_of v₁, from mem_perm (perm.symm p₁) ainw₁,
|
||||
have nainv₂ : a ∉ elt_of v₂, from disjoint_left d₁ ainv₁,
|
||||
not_mem_perm p₂ nainv₂)
|
||||
(λ ainw₂ : a ∈ elt_of w₂,
|
||||
have ainv₂ : a ∈ elt_of v₂, from mem_perm (perm.symm p₂) ainw₂,
|
||||
have nainv₁ : a ∉ elt_of v₁, from disjoint_right d₁ ainv₂,
|
||||
not_mem_perm p₁ nainv₁))
|
||||
(λ d₂ a, and.intro
|
||||
(λ ainv₁ : a ∈ elt_of v₁,
|
||||
have ainw₁ : a ∈ elt_of w₁, from mem_perm p₁ ainv₁,
|
||||
have nainw₂ : a ∉ elt_of w₂, from disjoint_left d₂ ainw₁,
|
||||
not_mem_perm (perm.symm p₂) nainw₂)
|
||||
(λ ainv₂ : a ∈ elt_of v₂,
|
||||
have ainw₂ : a ∈ elt_of w₂, from mem_perm p₂ ainv₂,
|
||||
have nainw₁ : a ∉ elt_of w₁, from disjoint_right d₂ ainw₂,
|
||||
not_mem_perm (perm.symm p₁) nainw₁))))
|
||||
(λ d₁ a (ainw₁ : a ∈ elt_of w₁),
|
||||
have ainv₁ : a ∈ elt_of v₁, from mem_perm (perm.symm p₁) ainw₁,
|
||||
have nainv₂ : a ∉ elt_of v₂, from disjoint_left d₁ ainv₁,
|
||||
not_mem_perm p₂ nainv₂)
|
||||
(λ d₂ a (ainv₁ : a ∈ elt_of v₁),
|
||||
have ainw₁ : a ∈ elt_of w₁, from mem_perm p₁ ainv₁,
|
||||
have nainw₂ : a ∉ elt_of w₂, from disjoint_left d₂ ainw₁,
|
||||
not_mem_perm (perm.symm p₂) nainw₂)))
|
||||
|
||||
theorem disjoint.comm {s₁ s₂ : finset A} : disjoint s₁ s₂ → disjoint s₂ s₁ :=
|
||||
quot.induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ (λ l₁ l₂ d, list.disjoint.comm d)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -132,45 +132,34 @@ end erase
|
|||
section disjoint
|
||||
variable {A : Type}
|
||||
|
||||
definition disjoint (l₁ l₂ : list A) : Prop := ∀ a, (a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂) ∧ (a ∈ l₂ → a ∉ l₁)
|
||||
definition disjoint (l₁ l₂ : list A) : Prop := ∀ a, (a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ → false)
|
||||
|
||||
lemma disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ : list A} : disjoint l₁ l₂ → ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ :=
|
||||
λ d a, and.elim_left (d a)
|
||||
λ d a, d a
|
||||
|
||||
lemma disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ : list A} : disjoint l₁ l₂ → ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₂ → a ∉ l₁ :=
|
||||
λ d a, and.elim_right (d a)
|
||||
λ d a i₂ i₁, d a i₁ i₂
|
||||
|
||||
lemma disjoint.comm {l₁ l₂ : list A} : disjoint l₁ l₂ → disjoint l₂ l₁ :=
|
||||
λ d a, and.intro
|
||||
(λ ainl₂ : a ∈ l₂, disjoint_right d ainl₂)
|
||||
(λ ainl₁ : a ∈ l₁, disjoint_left d ainl₁)
|
||||
λ d a i₂ i₁, d a i₁ i₂
|
||||
|
||||
lemma disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left {a : A} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
|
||||
λ d x, and.intro
|
||||
(λ xinl₁ : x ∈ l₁, disjoint_left d (or.inr xinl₁))
|
||||
(λ xinl₂ : x ∈ l₂,
|
||||
have nxinal₁ : x ∉ a::l₁, from disjoint_right d xinl₂,
|
||||
not_mem_of_not_mem nxinal₁)
|
||||
λ d x xinl₁, disjoint_left d (or.inr xinl₁)
|
||||
|
||||
lemma disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_right {a : A} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
|
||||
λ d, disjoint.comm (disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left (disjoint.comm d))
|
||||
|
||||
lemma disjoint_nil_left (l : list A) : disjoint [] l :=
|
||||
λ a, and.intro
|
||||
(λ ab : a ∈ nil, absurd ab !not_mem_nil)
|
||||
(λ ainl : a ∈ l, !not_mem_nil)
|
||||
λ a ab, absurd ab !not_mem_nil
|
||||
|
||||
lemma disjoint_nil_right (l : list A) : disjoint l [] :=
|
||||
disjoint.comm (disjoint_nil_left l)
|
||||
|
||||
lemma disjoint_cons_of_not_mem_of_disjoint {a : A} {l₁ l₂} : a ∉ l₂ → disjoint l₁ l₂ → disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ :=
|
||||
λ nainl₂ d x, and.intro
|
||||
(λ xinal₁ : x ∈ a::l₁, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xinal₁)
|
||||
λ nainl₂ d x (xinal₁ : x ∈ a::l₁),
|
||||
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xinal₁)
|
||||
(λ xeqa : x = a, xeqa⁻¹ ▸ nainl₂)
|
||||
(λ xinl₁ : x ∈ l₁, disjoint_left d xinl₁))
|
||||
(λ (xinl₂ : x ∈ l₂) (xinal₁ : x ∈ a::l₁), or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xinal₁)
|
||||
(λ xeqa : x = a, absurd (xeqa ▸ xinl₂) nainl₂)
|
||||
(λ xinl₁ : x ∈ l₁, absurd xinl₁ (disjoint_right d xinl₂)))
|
||||
(λ xinl₁ : x ∈ l₁, disjoint_left d xinl₁)
|
||||
|
||||
lemma disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_left : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l : list A}, disjoint (l₁++l₂) l → disjoint l₁ l
|
||||
| [] l₂ l d := disjoint_nil_left l
|
||||
|
@ -245,16 +234,10 @@ theorem disjoint_of_nodup_append : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list A}, nodup (l₁++l₂)
|
|||
have nxin : x ∉ xs++l₂, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons d₁,
|
||||
have nxinl₂ : x ∉ l₂, from not_mem_of_not_mem_append_right nxin,
|
||||
have dsj : disjoint xs l₂, from disjoint_of_nodup_append d₂,
|
||||
(λ a, and.intro
|
||||
(λ ainxxs : a ∈ x::xs,
|
||||
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ainxxs)
|
||||
(λ aeqx : a = x, aeqx⁻¹ ▸ nxinl₂)
|
||||
(λ ainxs : a ∈ xs, disjoint_left dsj ainxs))
|
||||
(λ ainl₂ : a ∈ l₂,
|
||||
have nainxs : a ∉ xs, from disjoint_right dsj ainl₂,
|
||||
assume ain : a ∈ x::xs, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ain)
|
||||
(λ aeqx : a = x, absurd (aeqx ▸ ainl₂) nxinl₂)
|
||||
(λ ainxs : a ∈ xs, absurd ainxs nainxs)))
|
||||
λ a (ainxxs : a ∈ x::xs),
|
||||
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ainxxs)
|
||||
(λ aeqx : a = x, aeqx⁻¹ ▸ nxinl₂)
|
||||
(λ ainxs : a ∈ xs, disjoint_left dsj ainxs)
|
||||
|
||||
theorem nodup_append_of_nodup_of_nodup_of_disjoint : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list A}, nodup l₁ → nodup l₂ → disjoint l₁ l₂ → nodup (l₁++l₂)
|
||||
| [] l₂ d₁ d₂ dsj := by rewrite [append_nil_left]; exact d₂
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue