michael/lean2
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
6656 commits 3 branches 0 tags 28 MiB
Commit graph

28 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Leonardo de Moura
4b1b3e277f feat(frontends/lean): rename '[unfold-c]' to '[unfold]' and '[unfold-f]' to '[unfold-full]' 
see issue #693
 2015-07-07 16:37:06 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
8b7dc4e03a feat(frontends/lean): apply eta-reduction in postprocessing step 
Perhaps, we should add an option to disable this new feature.

Remark: this commit makes commit 46d418a redundant.
I'm keeping 46d418a because we may retract this commit in the future.
 2015-06-10 16:29:30 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
0e099b5fd8 feat(library/tactic/rewrite_tactic): apply beta&eta reduction before rewriting steps, add option 'rewrite.beta_eta' (default true) to control new feature. 2015-06-06 20:43:52 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
0ceedbe69e fix(library/normalize): fixes #640 2015-05-29 15:58:59 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
f48cdccd20 fix(frontends/lean/pp): abbreviation with parameters 
closes #639
 2015-05-29 15:13:31 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
2d22bb8ea2 feat(frontends/lean/builtin_cmds): do not unfold proofs in the eval command 
In the future, we should probably add an option for unfolding proofs.
 2015-05-20 19:14:57 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
163577c23a fix(library/normalize): fixes #599 2015-05-13 18:36:16 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
cf7e60e5a6 refactor(kernel): remove "opaque" field from kernel declarations 
see issue #576
 2015-05-08 16:06:16 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
57ea660963 refactor(*): start process for eliminating of opaque definitions from the kernel 
see issue #576
 2015-05-08 16:06:04 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
b03266be70 feat(library/normalize,frontends/lean): rename '[unfold-m]' hint to '[constructor]', and allow it to be attached to constants 
closes #587
 2015-05-07 12:00:34 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
6571c47353 feat(library/normalize): add '[unfold-m]' hint 
See issue #496
 2015-05-04 14:23:04 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
d731a4ab13 feat(library/normalize): add '[unfold-f]' hint 
closes #497
 2015-04-05 03:00:13 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
7de3d5771d feat(library/tactic/rewrite_tactic): add eta-reduction support at esimp 
closes #469
 2015-03-12 00:32:31 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
c04c0e8381 refactor(*): remove transparent_scope hack, replace [strict] with [all-transparent] annotation 2015-02-07 15:19:41 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
62daf73dd0 chore(library/normalize): fix style 2015-02-06 13:27:10 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
ba641d7c58 feat(library/normalize): validate unfold-c hints 2015-02-06 12:42:53 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
1bd1f94542 feat(library/normalize): add "unfold-c" hint to normalizer 
This hint will also be used in the simplifier
 2015-02-06 12:39:49 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
58f052b1bb fix(library/normalize): unitialized variable 2015-01-01 19:33:14 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
5a9cd9eed4 fix(library/normalize): bug in the "eval" command 2014-12-15 19:22:17 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
78bc3ef7e4 feat(library/unifier): improve FailLocal/FailCircular failures in the unifier by using normalization 
This improvements was marked as TODO, and was preventing us from
elaborating the example in the new test vector3.lean
 2014-10-27 16:49:29 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
bca2be56ec feat(library/normalize): add new flavors of normalize procedure 2014-10-27 16:25:30 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
8e7aac1eb4 fix(frontends/lean): add 'eval' command 2014-09-26 20:16:03 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
4dd7abb14e refactor(library): explicit initialization/finalization 2014-09-23 10:45:14 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
9588336c15 refactor(kernel/type_checker): remove "global" constraint buffer from type_checker, and use constraint_seq instead 
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
 2014-08-20 16:46:19 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
cb000eda13 refactor(kernel): store binder_infor in local constants 
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
 2014-06-30 11:37:46 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
603dafbaf7 refactor(kernel): remove 'let'-expressions 
We simulate it in the following way:
1- An opaque 'let'-expressions (let x : t := v in b) is encoded as
      ((fun (x : t), b) v)
   We also use a macro (let-macro) to mark this pattern.
   Thus, the pretty-printer knows how to display it correctly.

2- Transparent 'let'-expressions are eagerly expanded by the parser.

Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
 2014-06-24 16:27:27 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
c5e8c10c9d fix(library/normalize): bug in normalize 
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
 2014-05-20 11:53:58 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
11793e7998 feat(library): add simple normalization procedure 
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
 2014-05-20 09:40:30 -07:00