Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Leonardo de Moura
9eb4dc4a81 feat(kernel, library/elaborator, frontends/lean): improve how elaborator_exceptions are displayed in the Lean frontend
This commit affects different modules.
I used the following approach:
1- I store the metavariable environment at unification_failure_justifications. The idea is to capture the set of instantiated metavariables at the time of failure.
2- I added a remove_detail function. It removes propagation steps from the justification tree object. I also remove the backtracking search space associated with higher-order unificiation. I keep only the search related to case-splits due to coercions and overloads.

3- I use the metavariable environment captured at step 1 when pretty printing the justification of an elaborator_exception.

Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2014-01-03 17:18:23 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
7726ccad28 chore(builtin): rename nat, int and real modules to Nat, Int and Real.
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2014-01-01 13:52:25 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
08718e33dc refactor(builtin): only load the kernel and natural numbers by default
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-12-30 13:35:37 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
46627289b8 fix(kernel/expr): avoid '_' as a binder name, we use '_' as a placeholder in the Lean frontend
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-12-19 14:47:53 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
4357c9196e feat(kernel/metavar): make sure that a metavariable 'm' can only be assigned to a term that contains free variables available in the context associated with 'm'
This commit also simplifies the method check_pi in the type_checker and type_inferer.
It also fixes process_meta_app in the elaborator.
The problem was in the method process_meta_app and process_meta_inst.
They were processing convertability constrains as equality constraints.
For example, process_meta_app would handle

    ctx |- Type << ?f b

as

    ctx |- Type =:= ?f b

This is not correct because a ?f that returns (Type U) for b satisfies the first but not the second.

Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-12-14 12:25:00 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
d87ad9eb7e refactor(util/lua): propagate C++ Lean exceptions in Lua
The following call sequence is possible:
C++ -> Lua -> C++ -> Lua -> C++

The first block of C++ is the Lean main function.
The main function invokes the Lua interpreter.
The Lua interpreter invokes a C++ Lean API.
Then the Lean API invokes a callback implemented in Lua.
The Lua callback invokes another Lean API.
Now, suppose the Lean API throws an exception.
We want the C++ exception to propagate over the mixed C++/Lua call stack.
We use the clone/rethrow exception idiom to achieve this goal.

Before this commit, the C++ exceptions were converted into strings
using the method what(), and then they were propagated over the Lua
stack using lua_error. A lua_error was then converted into a lua_exception when going back to C++.
This solution was very unsatisfactory, since all C++ exceptions were being converted into a lua_exception, and consequently the structure of the exception was being lost.

Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-11-27 12:25:29 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
590b14570f feat(lua): improve error handling in Lua API
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-11-16 18:21:42 -08:00