396 lines
12 KiB
Text
396 lines
12 KiB
Text
/-
|
||
Copyright (c) 2015 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
|
||
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
|
||
Author: Robert Y. Lewis
|
||
|
||
Basic facts about the positive natural numbers.
|
||
|
||
Developed primarily for use in the construction of ℝ. For the most part, the only theorems here
|
||
are those needed for that construction.
|
||
-/
|
||
import data.rat.order data.nat
|
||
open nat rat subtype eq.ops
|
||
|
||
namespace pnat
|
||
|
||
definition pnat := { n : ℕ | n > 0 }
|
||
|
||
notation `ℕ+` := pnat
|
||
|
||
definition pos (n : ℕ) (H : n > 0) : ℕ+ := tag n H
|
||
|
||
definition nat_of_pnat (p : ℕ+) : ℕ := elt_of p
|
||
reserve postfix `~`:std.prec.max_plus
|
||
local postfix ~ := nat_of_pnat
|
||
|
||
theorem pnat_pos (p : ℕ+) : p~ > 0 := has_property p
|
||
|
||
protected definition add (p q : ℕ+) : ℕ+ :=
|
||
tag (p~ + q~) (add_pos (pnat_pos p) (pnat_pos q))
|
||
|
||
protected definition mul (p q : ℕ+) : ℕ+ :=
|
||
tag (p~ * q~) (mul_pos (pnat_pos p) (pnat_pos q))
|
||
|
||
protected definition le (p q : ℕ+) := p~ ≤ q~
|
||
|
||
protected definition lt (p q : ℕ+) := p~ < q~
|
||
|
||
definition pnat_has_add [instance] [reducible] : has_add pnat :=
|
||
has_add.mk pnat.add
|
||
|
||
definition pnat_has_mul [instance] [reducible] : has_mul pnat :=
|
||
has_mul.mk pnat.mul
|
||
|
||
definition pnat_has_le [instance] [reducible] : has_le pnat :=
|
||
has_le.mk pnat.le
|
||
|
||
definition pnat_has_lt [instance] [reducible] : has_lt pnat :=
|
||
has_lt.mk pnat.lt
|
||
|
||
definition pnat_has_one [instance] [reducible] : has_one pnat :=
|
||
has_one.mk (pos (1:nat) dec_trivial)
|
||
|
||
protected lemma mul_def (p q : ℕ+) : p * q = tag (p~ * q~) (mul_pos (pnat_pos p) (pnat_pos q)) :=
|
||
rfl
|
||
|
||
protected lemma le_def (p q : ℕ+) : (p ≤ q) = (p~ ≤ q~) :=
|
||
rfl
|
||
|
||
protected lemma lt_def (p q : ℕ+) : (p < q) = (p~ < q~) :=
|
||
rfl
|
||
|
||
protected theorem pnat.eq {p q : ℕ+} : p~ = q~ → p = q :=
|
||
subtype.eq
|
||
|
||
definition pnat_le_decidable [instance] (p q : ℕ+) : decidable (p ≤ q) :=
|
||
begin rewrite pnat.le_def, exact nat.decidable_le p~ q~ end
|
||
|
||
definition pnat_lt_decidable [instance] {p q : ℕ+} : decidable (p < q) :=
|
||
begin rewrite pnat.lt_def, exact nat.decidable_lt p~ q~ end
|
||
|
||
protected theorem le_trans {p q r : ℕ+} : p ≤ q → q ≤ r → p ≤ r :=
|
||
begin rewrite *pnat.le_def, apply nat.le_trans end
|
||
|
||
definition max (p q : ℕ+) : ℕ+ :=
|
||
tag (max p~ q~) (lt_of_lt_of_le (!pnat_pos) (!le_max_right))
|
||
|
||
protected theorem max_right (a b : ℕ+) : max a b ≥ b :=
|
||
begin change b ≤ max a b, rewrite pnat.le_def, apply le_max_right end
|
||
|
||
protected theorem max_left (a b : ℕ+) : max a b ≥ a :=
|
||
begin change a ≤ max a b, rewrite pnat.le_def, apply le_max_left end
|
||
|
||
protected theorem max_eq_right {a b : ℕ+} (H : a < b) : max a b = b :=
|
||
begin rewrite pnat.lt_def at H, exact pnat.eq (max_eq_right_of_lt H) end
|
||
|
||
protected theorem max_eq_left {a b : ℕ+} (H : ¬ a < b) : max a b = a :=
|
||
begin rewrite pnat.lt_def at H, exact pnat.eq (max_eq_left (le_of_not_gt H)) end
|
||
|
||
protected theorem le_of_lt {a b : ℕ+} : a < b → a ≤ b :=
|
||
begin rewrite [pnat.lt_def, pnat.le_def], apply nat.le_of_lt end
|
||
|
||
protected theorem not_lt_of_ge {a b : ℕ+} : a ≤ b → ¬ (b < a) :=
|
||
begin rewrite [pnat.lt_def, pnat.le_def], apply not_lt_of_ge end
|
||
|
||
protected theorem le_of_not_gt {a b : ℕ+} : ¬ a < b → b ≤ a :=
|
||
begin rewrite [pnat.lt_def, pnat.le_def], apply le_of_not_gt end
|
||
|
||
protected theorem eq_of_le_of_ge {a b : ℕ+} : a ≤ b → b ≤ a → a = b :=
|
||
begin rewrite [+pnat.le_def], intros H1 H2, exact pnat.eq (eq_of_le_of_ge H1 H2) end
|
||
|
||
protected theorem le_refl (a : ℕ+) : a ≤ a :=
|
||
begin rewrite pnat.le_def end
|
||
|
||
notation 2 := (tag 2 dec_trivial : ℕ+)
|
||
notation 3 := (tag 3 dec_trivial : ℕ+)
|
||
definition pone : ℕ+ := tag 1 dec_trivial
|
||
|
||
definition rat_of_pnat [reducible] (n : ℕ+) : ℚ :=
|
||
n~
|
||
|
||
theorem pnat.to_rat_of_nat (n : ℕ+) : rat_of_pnat n = of_nat n~ :=
|
||
rfl
|
||
|
||
-- these will come in rat
|
||
|
||
theorem rat_of_nat_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ of_nat n :=
|
||
trivial
|
||
|
||
theorem rat_of_pnat_ge_one (n : ℕ+) : rat_of_pnat n ≥ 1 :=
|
||
of_nat_le_of_nat_of_le (pnat_pos n)
|
||
|
||
theorem rat_of_pnat_is_pos (n : ℕ+) : rat_of_pnat n > 0 :=
|
||
of_nat_lt_of_nat_of_lt (pnat_pos n)
|
||
|
||
theorem of_nat_le_of_nat_of_le {m n : ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : of_nat m ≤ of_nat n :=
|
||
of_nat_le_of_nat_of_le H
|
||
|
||
theorem of_nat_lt_of_nat_of_lt {m n : ℕ} (H : m < n) : of_nat m < of_nat n :=
|
||
of_nat_lt_of_nat_of_lt H
|
||
|
||
theorem rat_of_pnat_le_of_pnat_le {m n : ℕ+} (H : m ≤ n) : rat_of_pnat m ≤ rat_of_pnat n :=
|
||
begin rewrite pnat.le_def at H, exact of_nat_le_of_nat_of_le H end
|
||
|
||
theorem rat_of_pnat_lt_of_pnat_lt {m n : ℕ+} (H : m < n) : rat_of_pnat m < rat_of_pnat n :=
|
||
begin rewrite pnat.lt_def at H, exact of_nat_lt_of_nat_of_lt H end
|
||
|
||
theorem pnat_le_of_rat_of_pnat_le {m n : ℕ+} (H : rat_of_pnat m ≤ rat_of_pnat n) : m ≤ n :=
|
||
begin rewrite pnat.le_def, exact le_of_of_nat_le_of_nat H end
|
||
|
||
definition inv (n : ℕ+) : ℚ :=
|
||
(1 : ℚ) / rat_of_pnat n
|
||
|
||
local postfix `⁻¹` := inv
|
||
|
||
protected theorem inv_pos (n : ℕ+) : n⁻¹ > 0 := one_div_pos_of_pos !rat_of_pnat_is_pos
|
||
|
||
theorem inv_le_one (n : ℕ+) : n⁻¹ ≤ (1 : ℚ) :=
|
||
begin
|
||
unfold inv,
|
||
change 1 / rat_of_pnat n ≤ 1 / 1,
|
||
apply one_div_le_one_div_of_le,
|
||
apply zero_lt_one,
|
||
apply rat_of_pnat_ge_one
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
theorem inv_lt_one_of_gt {n : ℕ+} (H : n~ > 1) : n⁻¹ < (1 : ℚ) :=
|
||
begin
|
||
unfold inv,
|
||
change 1 / rat_of_pnat n < 1 / 1,
|
||
apply one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt,
|
||
apply zero_lt_one,
|
||
rewrite pnat.to_rat_of_nat,
|
||
apply (of_nat_lt_of_nat_of_lt H)
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
theorem pone_inv : pone⁻¹ = 1 := rfl
|
||
|
||
theorem add_invs_nonneg (m n : ℕ+) : 0 ≤ m⁻¹ + n⁻¹ :=
|
||
begin
|
||
apply le_of_lt,
|
||
apply add_pos,
|
||
repeat apply pnat.inv_pos
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
protected theorem one_mul (n : ℕ+) : pone * n = n :=
|
||
begin
|
||
apply pnat.eq,
|
||
unfold pone,
|
||
rewrite [pnat.mul_def, ↑nat_of_pnat, one_mul]
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
theorem pone_le (n : ℕ+) : pone ≤ n :=
|
||
begin rewrite pnat.le_def, exact succ_le_of_lt (pnat_pos n) end
|
||
|
||
theorem pnat_to_rat_mul (a b : ℕ+) : rat_of_pnat (a * b) = rat_of_pnat a * rat_of_pnat b := rfl
|
||
|
||
theorem mul_lt_mul_left {a b c : ℕ+} (H : a < b) : a * c < b * c :=
|
||
begin rewrite [pnat.lt_def at *], exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right H !pnat_pos end
|
||
|
||
theorem one_lt_two : pone < 2 :=
|
||
!nat.le_refl
|
||
|
||
theorem inv_two_mul_lt_inv (n : ℕ+) : (2 * n)⁻¹ < n⁻¹ :=
|
||
begin
|
||
rewrite ↑inv,
|
||
apply one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt,
|
||
apply rat_of_pnat_is_pos,
|
||
have H : n~ < (2 * n)~, begin
|
||
rewrite -pnat.one_mul at {1},
|
||
rewrite -pnat.lt_def,
|
||
apply mul_lt_mul_left,
|
||
apply one_lt_two
|
||
end,
|
||
apply of_nat_lt_of_nat_of_lt,
|
||
apply H
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
theorem inv_two_mul_le_inv (n : ℕ+) : (2 * n)⁻¹ ≤ n⁻¹ := rat.le_of_lt !inv_two_mul_lt_inv
|
||
|
||
theorem inv_ge_of_le {p q : ℕ+} (H : p ≤ q) : q⁻¹ ≤ p⁻¹ :=
|
||
one_div_le_one_div_of_le !rat_of_pnat_is_pos (rat_of_pnat_le_of_pnat_le H)
|
||
|
||
theorem inv_gt_of_lt {p q : ℕ+} (H : p < q) : q⁻¹ < p⁻¹ :=
|
||
one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt !rat_of_pnat_is_pos (rat_of_pnat_lt_of_pnat_lt H)
|
||
|
||
theorem ge_of_inv_le {p q : ℕ+} (H : p⁻¹ ≤ q⁻¹) : q ≤ p :=
|
||
pnat_le_of_rat_of_pnat_le (le_of_one_div_le_one_div !rat_of_pnat_is_pos H)
|
||
|
||
theorem two_mul (p : ℕ+) : rat_of_pnat (2 * p) = (1 + 1) * rat_of_pnat p :=
|
||
by rewrite pnat_to_rat_mul
|
||
|
||
protected theorem add_halves (p : ℕ+) : (2 * p)⁻¹ + (2 * p)⁻¹ = p⁻¹ :=
|
||
begin
|
||
rewrite [↑inv, -(add_halves (1 / (rat_of_pnat p))), div_div_eq_div_mul],
|
||
have H : rat_of_pnat (2 * p) = rat_of_pnat p * (1 + 1), by rewrite [rat.mul_comm, two_mul],
|
||
rewrite *H
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
theorem add_halves_double (m n : ℕ+) :
|
||
m⁻¹ + n⁻¹ = ((2 * m)⁻¹ + (2 * n)⁻¹) + ((2 * m)⁻¹ + (2 * n)⁻¹) :=
|
||
have hsimp [visible] : ∀ a b : ℚ, (a + a) + (b + b) = (a + b) + (a + b),
|
||
by intros; rewrite [rat.add_assoc, -(rat.add_assoc a b b), {_+b}rat.add_comm, -*rat.add_assoc],
|
||
by rewrite [-pnat.add_halves m, -pnat.add_halves n, hsimp]
|
||
|
||
protected theorem inv_mul_eq_mul_inv {p q : ℕ+} : (p * q)⁻¹ = p⁻¹ * q⁻¹ :=
|
||
begin rewrite [↑inv, pnat_to_rat_mul, one_div_mul_one_div] end
|
||
|
||
protected theorem inv_mul_le_inv (p q : ℕ+) : (p * q)⁻¹ ≤ q⁻¹ :=
|
||
begin
|
||
rewrite [pnat.inv_mul_eq_mul_inv, -{q⁻¹}rat.one_mul at {2}],
|
||
apply mul_le_mul,
|
||
apply inv_le_one,
|
||
apply le.refl,
|
||
apply le_of_lt,
|
||
apply pnat.inv_pos,
|
||
apply rat.le_of_lt rat.zero_lt_one
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
theorem pnat_mul_le_mul_left' (a b c : ℕ+) : a ≤ b → c * a ≤ c * b :=
|
||
begin
|
||
rewrite +pnat.le_def, intro H,
|
||
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left H,
|
||
apply le_of_lt,
|
||
apply pnat_pos
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
protected theorem mul_assoc (a b c : ℕ+) : a * b * c = a * (b * c) :=
|
||
pnat.eq !mul.assoc
|
||
|
||
protected theorem mul_comm (a b : ℕ+) : a * b = b * a :=
|
||
pnat.eq !mul.comm
|
||
|
||
protected theorem add_assoc (a b c : ℕ+) : a + b + c = a + (b + c) :=
|
||
pnat.eq !add.assoc
|
||
|
||
protected theorem mul_le_mul_left (p q : ℕ+) : q ≤ p * q :=
|
||
begin
|
||
rewrite [-pnat.one_mul at {1}, pnat.mul_comm, pnat.mul_comm p],
|
||
apply pnat_mul_le_mul_left',
|
||
apply pone_le
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
protected theorem mul_le_mul_right (p q : ℕ+) : p ≤ p * q :=
|
||
by rewrite pnat.mul_comm; apply pnat.mul_le_mul_left
|
||
|
||
theorem pnat.lt_of_not_le {p q : ℕ+} : ¬ p ≤ q → q < p :=
|
||
begin rewrite [pnat.le_def, pnat.lt_def], apply lt_of_not_ge end
|
||
|
||
protected theorem inv_cancel_left (p : ℕ+) : rat_of_pnat p * p⁻¹ = (1 : ℚ) :=
|
||
mul_one_div_cancel (ne.symm (ne_of_lt !rat_of_pnat_is_pos))
|
||
|
||
protected theorem inv_cancel_right (p : ℕ+) : p⁻¹ * rat_of_pnat p = (1 : ℚ) :=
|
||
by rewrite rat.mul_comm; apply pnat.inv_cancel_left
|
||
|
||
theorem lt_add_left (p q : ℕ+) : p < p + q :=
|
||
begin
|
||
have H : p~ < p~ + q~, begin
|
||
rewrite -nat.add_zero at {1},
|
||
apply nat.add_lt_add_left,
|
||
apply pnat_pos
|
||
end,
|
||
apply H
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
theorem inv_add_lt_left (p q : ℕ+) : (p + q)⁻¹ < p⁻¹ :=
|
||
by apply inv_gt_of_lt; apply lt_add_left
|
||
|
||
theorem div_le_pnat (q : ℚ) (n : ℕ+) (H : q ≥ n⁻¹) : 1 / q ≤ rat_of_pnat n :=
|
||
begin
|
||
apply div_le_of_le_mul,
|
||
apply lt_of_lt_of_le,
|
||
apply pnat.inv_pos,
|
||
rotate 1,
|
||
apply H,
|
||
apply le_mul_of_div_le,
|
||
apply rat_of_pnat_is_pos,
|
||
apply H
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
theorem pnat_cancel' (n m : ℕ+) : (n * n * m)⁻¹ * (rat_of_pnat n * rat_of_pnat n) = m⁻¹ :=
|
||
assert hsimp : ∀ a b c : ℚ, (a * a * (b * b * c)) = (a * b) * (a * b) * c,
|
||
begin
|
||
intro a b c,
|
||
rewrite[-*rat.mul_assoc],
|
||
exact (!mul.right_comm ▸ rfl),
|
||
end,
|
||
by rewrite [rat.mul_comm, *pnat.inv_mul_eq_mul_inv, hsimp, *pnat.inv_cancel_left, *rat.one_mul]
|
||
|
||
definition pceil (a : ℚ) : ℕ+ := tag (ubound a) !ubound_pos
|
||
|
||
theorem pceil_helper {a : ℚ} {n : ℕ+} (H : pceil a ≤ n) (Ha : a > 0) : n⁻¹ ≤ 1 / a :=
|
||
le.trans (inv_ge_of_le H) (one_div_le_one_div_of_le Ha (ubound_ge a))
|
||
|
||
theorem inv_pceil_div (a b : ℚ) (Ha : a > 0) (Hb : b > 0) : (pceil (a / b))⁻¹ ≤ b / a :=
|
||
assert (pceil (a / b))⁻¹ ≤ 1 / (1 / (b / a)),
|
||
begin
|
||
apply one_div_le_one_div_of_le,
|
||
show 0 < 1 / (b / a), from
|
||
one_div_pos_of_pos (div_pos_of_pos_of_pos Hb Ha),
|
||
show 1 / (b / a) ≤ rat_of_pnat (pceil (a / b)),
|
||
begin
|
||
rewrite div_div_eq_mul_div,
|
||
rewrite one_mul,
|
||
apply ubound_ge
|
||
end
|
||
end,
|
||
begin
|
||
rewrite one_div_one_div at this,
|
||
exact this
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
theorem sep_by_inv {a b : ℚ} : a > b → ∃ N : ℕ+, a > (b + N⁻¹ + N⁻¹) :=
|
||
begin
|
||
change b < a → ∃ N : ℕ+, (b + N⁻¹ + N⁻¹) < a,
|
||
intro H,
|
||
apply exists.elim (exists_add_lt_and_pos_of_lt H),
|
||
intro c Hc,
|
||
existsi (pceil ((1 + 1 + 1) / c)),
|
||
apply lt.trans,
|
||
rotate 1,
|
||
apply and.left Hc,
|
||
rewrite rat.add_assoc,
|
||
apply rat.add_lt_add_left,
|
||
rewrite -(add_halves c) at {3},
|
||
apply add_lt_add,
|
||
repeat (apply lt_of_le_of_lt;
|
||
apply inv_pceil_div;
|
||
apply dec_trivial;
|
||
apply and.right Hc;
|
||
apply div_lt_div_of_pos_of_lt_of_pos;
|
||
apply two_pos;
|
||
exact dec_trivial;
|
||
apply and.right Hc)
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
theorem nonneg_of_ge_neg_invs (a : ℚ) : (∀ n : ℕ+, -n⁻¹ ≤ a) → 0 ≤ a :=
|
||
begin
|
||
intro H,
|
||
apply le_of_not_gt,
|
||
suppose a < 0,
|
||
have H2 : 0 < -a, from neg_pos_of_neg this,
|
||
(not_lt_of_ge !H) (iff.mp !lt_neg_iff_lt_neg (calc
|
||
(pceil (of_num 2 / -a))⁻¹ ≤ -a / of_num 2
|
||
: !inv_pceil_div dec_trivial H2
|
||
... < -a / 1
|
||
: div_lt_div_of_pos_of_lt_of_pos dec_trivial dec_trivial H2
|
||
... = -a : !div_one))
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
theorem pnat_bound {ε : ℚ} (Hε : ε > 0) : ∃ p : ℕ+, p⁻¹ ≤ ε :=
|
||
begin
|
||
existsi (pceil (1 / ε)),
|
||
rewrite -(one_div_one_div ε) at {2},
|
||
apply pceil_helper,
|
||
apply pnat.le_refl,
|
||
apply one_div_pos_of_pos Hε
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
theorem p_add_fractions (n : ℕ+) : (2 * n)⁻¹ + (2 * 3 * n)⁻¹ + (3 * n)⁻¹ = n⁻¹ :=
|
||
assert T : 2⁻¹ + 2⁻¹ * 3⁻¹ + 3⁻¹ = 1, from dec_trivial,
|
||
by rewrite[*pnat.inv_mul_eq_mul_inv,-*right_distrib,T,rat.one_mul]
|
||
|
||
theorem rat_power_two_le (k : ℕ+) : rat_of_pnat k ≤ 2^k~ :=
|
||
!binary_nat_bound
|
||
|
||
end pnat
|