lean2/library/standard/logic/axioms/hilbert.lean
2014-08-15 12:58:58 -07:00

71 lines
2.6 KiB
Text

-- Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
import logic.connectives.eq logic.connectives.quantifiers
import logic.classes.inhabited logic.classes.nonempty
import data.subtype data.sum
using subtype
-- logic.axioms.hilbert
-- ====================
-- Follows Coq.Logic.ClassicalEpsilon (but our definition of "inhabited" is the
-- constructive one).
axiom strong_indefinite_description {A : Type} (P : A → Prop) (H : nonempty A) :
{x : A | (∃x : A, P x) → P x}
-- In the presence of classical logic, we could prove this from the weaker
-- axiom indefinite_description {A : Type} {P : A->Prop} (H : ∃x, P x) : { x : A | P x }
theorem nonempty_imp_exists_true {A : Type} (H : nonempty A) : ∃x : A, true :=
nonempty_elim H (take x, exists_intro x trivial)
theorem nonempty_imp_inhabited {A : Type} (H : nonempty A) : inhabited A :=
let u : {x : A | (∃x : A, true) → true} := strong_indefinite_description (λa, true) H in
inhabited_intro (elt_of u)
theorem inhabited_exists {A : Type} {P : A → Prop} (H : ∃x, P x) : inhabited A :=
nonempty_imp_inhabited (obtain w Hw, from H, nonempty_intro w)
-- the Hilbert epsilon function
-- ----------------------------
definition epsilon {A : Type} {H : nonempty A} (P : A → Prop) : A :=
let u : {x : A | (∃y, P y) → P x} :=
strong_indefinite_description P H in
elt_of u
theorem epsilon_spec_aux {A : Type} (H : nonempty A) (P : A → Prop) (Hex : ∃y, P y) :
P (@epsilon A H P) :=
let u : {x : A | (∃y, P y) → P x} :=
strong_indefinite_description P H in
has_property u Hex
theorem epsilon_spec {A : Type} {P : A → Prop} (Hex : ∃y, P y) :
P (@epsilon A (exists_imp_nonempty Hex) P) :=
epsilon_spec_aux (exists_imp_nonempty Hex) P Hex
theorem epsilon_singleton {A : Type} (a : A) : @epsilon A (nonempty_intro a) (λx, x = a) = a :=
epsilon_spec (exists_intro a (refl a))
-- the axiom of choice
-- -------------------
theorem axiom_of_choice {A : Type} {B : A → Type} {R : Πx, B x → Prop} (H : ∀x, ∃y, R x y) :
∃f, ∀x, R x (f x) :=
let f [inline] := λx, @epsilon _ (exists_imp_nonempty (H x)) (λy, R x y),
H [inline] := take x, epsilon_spec (H x)
in exists_intro f H
theorem skolem {A : Type} {B : A → Type} {P : Πx, B x → Prop} :
(∀x, ∃y, P x y) ↔ ∃f, (∀x, P x (f x)) :=
iff_intro
(assume H : (∀x, ∃y, P x y), axiom_of_choice H)
(assume H : (∃f, (∀x, P x (f x))),
take x, obtain (fw : ∀x, B x) (Hw : ∀x, P x (fw x)), from H,
exists_intro (fw x) (Hw x))