f513538631
remove funext class, remove a couple of sorry's, add characterization of equality in trunctypes, use Jeremy's format for headers everywhere in the HoTT library, continue working on Yoneda embedding
684 lines
25 KiB
Text
684 lines
25 KiB
Text
/-
|
||
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
|
||
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
|
||
|
||
Module: init.path
|
||
Author: Jeremy Avigad, Jakob von Raumer, Floris van Doorn
|
||
|
||
Ported from Coq HoTT
|
||
-/
|
||
|
||
prelude
|
||
import .function .datatypes .relation .tactic
|
||
|
||
open function eq
|
||
|
||
/- Path equality -/
|
||
|
||
namespace eq
|
||
variables {A B C : Type} {P : A → Type} {x y z t : A}
|
||
|
||
--notation a = b := eq a b
|
||
notation x = y `:>`:50 A:49 := @eq A x y
|
||
definition idp {a : A} := refl a
|
||
definition idpath (a : A) := refl a
|
||
|
||
-- unbased path induction
|
||
definition rec' [reducible] {P : Π (a b : A), (a = b) -> Type}
|
||
(H : Π (a : A), P a a idp) {a b : A} (p : a = b) : P a b p :=
|
||
eq.rec (H a) p
|
||
|
||
definition rec_on' [reducible] {P : Π (a b : A), (a = b) -> Type} {a b : A} (p : a = b)
|
||
(H : Π (a : A), P a a idp) : P a b p :=
|
||
eq.rec (H a) p
|
||
|
||
/- Concatenation and inverse -/
|
||
|
||
definition concat (p : x = y) (q : y = z) : x = z :=
|
||
eq.rec (λu, u) q p
|
||
|
||
definition inverse (p : x = y) : y = x :=
|
||
eq.rec (refl x) p
|
||
|
||
notation p₁ ⬝ p₂ := concat p₁ p₂
|
||
notation p ⁻¹ := inverse p
|
||
--a second notation for the inverse, which is not overloaded
|
||
postfix [parsing-only] `⁻¹ᵖ`:100 := inverse
|
||
|
||
|
||
/- The 1-dimensional groupoid structure -/
|
||
|
||
-- The identity path is a right unit.
|
||
definition con_idp (p : x = y) : p ⬝ idp = p :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
-- The identity path is a right unit.
|
||
definition idp_con (p : x = y) : idp ⬝ p = p :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
-- Concatenation is associative.
|
||
definition con.assoc' (p : x = y) (q : y = z) (r : z = t) :
|
||
p ⬝ (q ⬝ r) = (p ⬝ q) ⬝ r :=
|
||
eq.rec_on r (eq.rec_on q idp)
|
||
|
||
definition con.assoc (p : x = y) (q : y = z) (r : z = t) :
|
||
(p ⬝ q) ⬝ r = p ⬝ (q ⬝ r) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on r (eq.rec_on q idp)
|
||
|
||
-- The left inverse law.
|
||
definition con.left_inv (p : x = y) : p ⬝ p⁻¹ = idp :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
-- The right inverse law.
|
||
definition con.right_inv (p : x = y) : p⁻¹ ⬝ p = idp :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
/- Several auxiliary theorems about canceling inverses across associativity. These are somewhat
|
||
redundant, following from earlier theorems. -/
|
||
|
||
definition inv_con_cancel_left (p : x = y) (q : y = z) : p⁻¹ ⬝ (p ⬝ q) = q :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q (eq.rec_on p idp)
|
||
|
||
definition con_inv_cancel_left (p : x = y) (q : x = z) : p ⬝ (p⁻¹ ⬝ q) = q :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q (eq.rec_on p idp)
|
||
|
||
definition con_inv_cancel_right (p : x = y) (q : y = z) : (p ⬝ q) ⬝ q⁻¹ = p :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q (eq.rec_on p idp)
|
||
|
||
definition inv_con_cancel_right (p : x = z) (q : y = z) : (p ⬝ q⁻¹) ⬝ q = p :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q (take p, eq.rec_on p idp) p
|
||
|
||
-- Inverse distributes over concatenation
|
||
definition con_inv (p : x = y) (q : y = z) : (p ⬝ q)⁻¹ = q⁻¹ ⬝ p⁻¹ :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q (eq.rec_on p idp)
|
||
|
||
definition inv_con_inv_left (p : y = x) (q : y = z) : (p⁻¹ ⬝ q)⁻¹ = q⁻¹ ⬝ p :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q (eq.rec_on p idp)
|
||
|
||
-- universe metavariables
|
||
definition inv_con_inv_right (p : x = y) (q : z = y) : (p ⬝ q⁻¹)⁻¹ = q ⬝ p⁻¹ :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p (take q, eq.rec_on q idp) q
|
||
|
||
definition inv_con_inv_inv (p : y = x) (q : z = y) : (p⁻¹ ⬝ q⁻¹)⁻¹ = q ⬝ p :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p (eq.rec_on q idp)
|
||
|
||
-- Inverse is an involution.
|
||
definition inv_inv (p : x = y) : p⁻¹⁻¹ = p :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
/- Theorems for moving things around in equations -/
|
||
|
||
definition con_eq_of_eq_inv_con (p : x = z) (q : y = z) (r : y = x) :
|
||
p = r⁻¹ ⬝ q → r ⬝ p = q :=
|
||
eq.rec_on r (take p h, idp_con _ ⬝ h ⬝ idp_con _) p
|
||
|
||
definition con_eq_of_eq_con_inv (p : x = z) (q : y = z) (r : y = x) :
|
||
r = q ⬝ p⁻¹ → r ⬝ p = q :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p (take q h, (con_idp _ ⬝ h ⬝ con_idp _)) q
|
||
|
||
definition inv_con_eq_of_eq_con (p : x = z) (q : y = z) (r : x = y) :
|
||
p = r ⬝ q → r⁻¹ ⬝ p = q :=
|
||
eq.rec_on r (take q h, idp_con _ ⬝ h ⬝ idp_con _) q
|
||
|
||
definition con_inv_eq_of_eq_con (p : z = x) (q : y = z) (r : y = x) :
|
||
r = q ⬝ p → r ⬝ p⁻¹ = q :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p (take r h, con_idp _ ⬝ h ⬝ con_idp _) r
|
||
|
||
definition eq_con_of_inv_con_eq (p : x = z) (q : y = z) (r : y = x) :
|
||
r⁻¹ ⬝ q = p → q = r ⬝ p :=
|
||
eq.rec_on r (take p h, (idp_con _)⁻¹ ⬝ h ⬝ (idp_con _)⁻¹) p
|
||
|
||
definition eq_con_of_con_inv_eq (p : x = z) (q : y = z) (r : y = x) :
|
||
q ⬝ p⁻¹ = r → q = r ⬝ p :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p (take q h, (con_idp _)⁻¹ ⬝ h ⬝ (con_idp _)⁻¹) q
|
||
|
||
definition eq_inv_con_of_con_eq (p : x = z) (q : y = z) (r : x = y) :
|
||
r ⬝ q = p → q = r⁻¹ ⬝ p :=
|
||
eq.rec_on r (take q h, (idp_con _)⁻¹ ⬝ h ⬝ (idp_con _)⁻¹) q
|
||
|
||
definition eq_con_inv_of_con_eq (p : z = x) (q : y = z) (r : y = x) :
|
||
q ⬝ p = r → q = r ⬝ p⁻¹ :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p (take r h, (con_idp _)⁻¹ ⬝ h ⬝ (con_idp _)⁻¹) r
|
||
|
||
definition eq_of_con_inv_eq_idp (p q : x = y) :
|
||
p ⬝ q⁻¹ = idp → p = q :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q (take p h, (con_idp _)⁻¹ ⬝ h) p
|
||
|
||
definition eq_of_inv_con_eq_idp (p q : x = y) :
|
||
q⁻¹ ⬝ p = idp → p = q :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q (take p h, (idp_con _)⁻¹ ⬝ h) p
|
||
|
||
definition eq_inv_of_con_eq_idp' (p : x = y) (q : y = x) :
|
||
p ⬝ q = idp → p = q⁻¹ :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q (take p h, (con_idp _)⁻¹ ⬝ h) p
|
||
|
||
definition eq_inv_of_con_eq_idp (p : x = y) (q : y = x) :
|
||
q ⬝ p = idp → p = q⁻¹ :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q (take p h, (idp_con _)⁻¹ ⬝ h) p
|
||
|
||
definition eq_of_idp_eq_inv_con (p q : x = y) :
|
||
idp = p⁻¹ ⬝ q → p = q :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p (take q h, h ⬝ (idp_con _)) q
|
||
|
||
definition eq_of_idp_eq_con_inv (p q : x = y) :
|
||
idp = q ⬝ p⁻¹ → p = q :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p (take q h, h ⬝ (con_idp _)) q
|
||
|
||
definition inv_eq_of_idp_eq_con (p : x = y) (q : y = x) :
|
||
idp = q ⬝ p → p⁻¹ = q :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p (take q h, h ⬝ (con_idp _)) q
|
||
|
||
definition inv_eq_of_idp_eq_con' (p : x = y) (q : y = x) :
|
||
idp = p ⬝ q → p⁻¹ = q :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p (take q h, h ⬝ (idp_con _)) q
|
||
|
||
/- Transport -/
|
||
|
||
definition transport [reducible] (P : A → Type) {x y : A} (p : x = y) (u : P x) : P y :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p u
|
||
|
||
-- This idiom makes the operation right associative.
|
||
notation p `▹`:65 x:64 := transport _ p x
|
||
|
||
definition tr_inv [reducible] (P : A → Type) {x y : A} (p : x = y) (u : P y) : P x :=
|
||
p⁻¹ ▹ u
|
||
|
||
definition ap ⦃A B : Type⦄ (f : A → B) {x y:A} (p : x = y) : f x = f y :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
definition ap01 := ap
|
||
|
||
definition homotopy [reducible] (f g : Πx, P x) : Type :=
|
||
Πx : A, f x = g x
|
||
|
||
notation f ∼ g := homotopy f g
|
||
|
||
namespace homotopy
|
||
protected definition refl (f : Πx, P x) : f ∼ f :=
|
||
λ x, idp
|
||
|
||
protected definition symm {f g : Πx, P x} (H : f ∼ g) : g ∼ f :=
|
||
λ x, inverse (H x)
|
||
|
||
protected definition trans {f g h : Πx, P x} (H1 : f ∼ g) (H2 : g ∼ h) : f ∼ h :=
|
||
λ x, concat (H1 x) (H2 x)
|
||
|
||
calc_refl refl
|
||
calc_symm symm
|
||
calc_trans trans
|
||
end homotopy
|
||
|
||
definition apD10 {f g : Πx, P x} (H : f = g) : f ∼ g :=
|
||
λx, eq.rec_on H idp
|
||
|
||
--the next theorem is useful if you want to write "apply (apD10' a)"
|
||
definition apD10' {f g : Πx, P x} (a : A) (H : f = g) : f a = g a :=
|
||
eq.rec_on H idp
|
||
|
||
definition ap10 {f g : A → B} (H : f = g) : f ∼ g := apD10 H
|
||
|
||
definition ap11 {f g : A → B} (H : f = g) {x y : A} (p : x = y) : f x = g y :=
|
||
eq.rec_on H (eq.rec_on p idp)
|
||
|
||
definition apD (f : Πa:A, P a) {x y : A} (p : x = y) : p ▹ (f x) = f y :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
/- calc enviroment -/
|
||
|
||
calc_subst transport
|
||
calc_trans concat
|
||
calc_refl refl
|
||
calc_symm inverse
|
||
|
||
/- More theorems for moving things around in equations -/
|
||
|
||
definition tr_eq_of_eq_inv_tr (P : A → Type) {x y : A} (p : x = y) (u : P x) (v : P y) :
|
||
u = p⁻¹ ▹ v → p ▹ u = v :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p (take v, id) v
|
||
|
||
definition inv_tr_eq_of_eq_tr (P : A → Type) {x y : A} (p : y = x) (u : P x) (v : P y) :
|
||
u = p ▹ v → p⁻¹ ▹ u = v :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p (take u, id) u
|
||
|
||
definition eq_inv_tr_of_tr_eq (P : A → Type) {x y : A} (p : x = y) (u : P x) (v : P y) :
|
||
p ▹ u = v → u = p⁻¹ ▹ v :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p (take v, id) v
|
||
|
||
definition eq_tr_of_inv_tr_eq (P : A → Type) {x y : A} (p : y = x) (u : P x) (v : P y) :
|
||
p⁻¹ ▹ u = v → u = p ▹ v :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p (take u, id) u
|
||
|
||
/- Functoriality of functions -/
|
||
|
||
-- Here we prove that functions behave like functors between groupoids, and that [ap] itself is
|
||
-- functorial.
|
||
|
||
-- Functions take identity paths to identity paths
|
||
definition ap_idp (x : A) (f : A → B) : (ap f idp) = idp :> (f x = f x) := idp
|
||
|
||
definition apD_idp (x : A) (f : Π x : A, P x) : apD f idp = idp :> (f x = f x) := idp
|
||
|
||
-- Functions commute with concatenation.
|
||
definition ap_con (f : A → B) {x y z : A} (p : x = y) (q : y = z) :
|
||
ap f (p ⬝ q) = (ap f p) ⬝ (ap f q) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q (eq.rec_on p idp)
|
||
|
||
definition con_ap_con_eq_con_ap_con_ap (f : A → B) {w x y z : A} (r : f w = f x) (p : x = y) (q : y = z) :
|
||
r ⬝ (ap f (p ⬝ q)) = (r ⬝ ap f p) ⬝ (ap f q) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q (take p, eq.rec_on p (con.assoc' r idp idp)) p
|
||
|
||
definition ap_con_con_eq_ap_con_ap_con (f : A → B) {w x y z : A} (p : x = y) (q : y = z) (r : f z = f w) :
|
||
(ap f (p ⬝ q)) ⬝ r = (ap f p) ⬝ (ap f q ⬝ r) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q (eq.rec_on p (take r, con.assoc _ _ _)) r
|
||
|
||
-- Functions commute with path inverses.
|
||
definition ap_inv' (f : A → B) {x y : A} (p : x = y) : (ap f p)⁻¹ = ap f (p⁻¹) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
definition ap_inv {A B : Type} (f : A → B) {x y : A} (p : x = y) : ap f (p⁻¹) = (ap f p)⁻¹ :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
-- [ap] itself is functorial in the first argument.
|
||
|
||
definition ap_id (p : x = y) : ap id p = p :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
definition ap_compose (f : A → B) (g : B → C) {x y : A} (p : x = y) :
|
||
ap (g ∘ f) p = ap g (ap f p) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
-- Sometimes we don't have the actual function [compose].
|
||
definition ap_compose' (f : A → B) (g : B → C) {x y : A} (p : x = y) :
|
||
ap (λa, g (f a)) p = ap g (ap f p) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
-- The action of constant maps.
|
||
definition ap_constant (p : x = y) (z : B) :
|
||
ap (λu, z) p = idp :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
-- Naturality of [ap].
|
||
definition ap_con_eq_con_ap {f g : A → B} (p : Π x, f x = g x) {x y : A} (q : x = y) :
|
||
(ap f q) ⬝ (p y) = (p x) ⬝ (ap g q) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q (idp_con _ ⬝ (con_idp _)⁻¹)
|
||
|
||
-- Naturality of [ap] at identity.
|
||
definition ap_con_eq_con {f : A → A} (p : Πx, f x = x) {x y : A} (q : x = y) :
|
||
(ap f q) ⬝ (p y) = (p x) ⬝ q :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q (idp_con _ ⬝ (con_idp _)⁻¹)
|
||
|
||
definition con_ap_eq_con {f : A → A} (p : Πx, x = f x) {x y : A} (q : x = y) :
|
||
(p x) ⬝ (ap f q) = q ⬝ (p y) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q (con_idp _ ⬝ (idp_con _)⁻¹)
|
||
|
||
-- Naturality with other paths hanging around.
|
||
|
||
definition con_ap_con_con_eq_con_con_ap_con {f g : A → B} (p : f ∼ g) {x y : A} (q : x = y)
|
||
{w z : B} (r : w = f x) (s : g y = z) :
|
||
(r ⬝ ap f q) ⬝ (p y ⬝ s) = (r ⬝ p x) ⬝ (ap g q ⬝ s) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on s (eq.rec_on q idp)
|
||
|
||
definition con_ap_con_eq_con_con_ap {f g : A → B} (p : f ∼ g) {x y : A} (q : x = y)
|
||
{w : B} (r : w = f x) :
|
||
(r ⬝ ap f q) ⬝ p y = (r ⬝ p x) ⬝ ap g q :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q idp
|
||
|
||
-- TODO: try this using the simplifier, and compare proofs
|
||
definition ap_con_con_eq_con_ap_con {f g : A → B} (p : f ∼ g) {x y : A} (q : x = y)
|
||
{z : B} (s : g y = z) :
|
||
(ap f q) ⬝ (p y ⬝ s) = (p x) ⬝ (ap g q ⬝ s) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on s (eq.rec_on q
|
||
(calc
|
||
(ap f idp) ⬝ (p x ⬝ idp) = idp ⬝ p x : idp
|
||
... = p x : idp_con _
|
||
... = (p x) ⬝ (ap g idp ⬝ idp) : idp))
|
||
-- This also works:
|
||
-- eq.rec_on s (eq.rec_on q (idp_con _ ▹ idp))
|
||
|
||
definition con_ap_con_con_eq_con_con_con {f : A → A} (p : f ∼ id) {x y : A} (q : x = y)
|
||
{w z : A} (r : w = f x) (s : y = z) :
|
||
(r ⬝ ap f q) ⬝ (p y ⬝ s) = (r ⬝ p x) ⬝ (q ⬝ s) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on s (eq.rec_on q idp)
|
||
|
||
definition con_con_ap_con_eq_con_con_con {g : A → A} (p : id ∼ g) {x y : A} (q : x = y)
|
||
{w z : A} (r : w = x) (s : g y = z) :
|
||
(r ⬝ p x) ⬝ (ap g q ⬝ s) = (r ⬝ q) ⬝ (p y ⬝ s) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on s (eq.rec_on q idp)
|
||
|
||
definition con_ap_con_eq_con_con {f : A → A} (p : f ∼ id) {x y : A} (q : x = y)
|
||
{w : A} (r : w = f x) :
|
||
(r ⬝ ap f q) ⬝ p y = (r ⬝ p x) ⬝ q :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q idp
|
||
|
||
definition ap_con_con_eq_con_con {f : A → A} (p : f ∼ id) {x y : A} (q : x = y)
|
||
{z : A} (s : y = z) :
|
||
(ap f q) ⬝ (p y ⬝ s) = (p x) ⬝ (q ⬝ s) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on s (eq.rec_on q (idp_con _ ▹ idp))
|
||
|
||
definition con_con_ap_eq_con_con {g : A → A} (p : id ∼ g) {x y : A} (q : x = y)
|
||
{w : A} (r : w = x) :
|
||
(r ⬝ p x) ⬝ ap g q = (r ⬝ q) ⬝ p y :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q idp
|
||
|
||
definition con_ap_con_eq_con_con' {g : A → A} (p : id ∼ g) {x y : A} (q : x = y)
|
||
{z : A} (s : g y = z) :
|
||
p x ⬝ (ap g q ⬝ s) = q ⬝ (p y ⬝ s) :=
|
||
begin
|
||
apply (eq.rec_on s),
|
||
apply (eq.rec_on q),
|
||
apply (idp_con (p x) ▹ idp)
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
/- Action of [apD10] and [ap10] on paths -/
|
||
|
||
-- Application of paths between functions preserves the groupoid structure
|
||
|
||
definition apD10_idp (f : Πx, P x) (x : A) : apD10 (refl f) x = idp := idp
|
||
|
||
definition apD10_con {f f' f'' : Πx, P x} (h : f = f') (h' : f' = f'') (x : A) :
|
||
apD10 (h ⬝ h') x = apD10 h x ⬝ apD10 h' x :=
|
||
eq.rec_on h (take h', eq.rec_on h' idp) h'
|
||
|
||
definition apD10_inv {f g : Πx : A, P x} (h : f = g) (x : A) :
|
||
apD10 (h⁻¹) x = (apD10 h x)⁻¹ :=
|
||
eq.rec_on h idp
|
||
|
||
definition ap10_idp {f : A → B} (x : A) : ap10 (refl f) x = idp := idp
|
||
|
||
definition ap10_con {f f' f'' : A → B} (h : f = f') (h' : f' = f'') (x : A) :
|
||
ap10 (h ⬝ h') x = ap10 h x ⬝ ap10 h' x := apD10_con h h' x
|
||
|
||
definition ap10_inv {f g : A → B} (h : f = g) (x : A) : ap10 (h⁻¹) x = (ap10 h x)⁻¹ :=
|
||
apD10_inv h x
|
||
|
||
-- [ap10] also behaves nicely on paths produced by [ap]
|
||
definition ap_ap10 (f g : A → B) (h : B → C) (p : f = g) (a : A) :
|
||
ap h (ap10 p a) = ap10 (ap (λ f', h ∘ f') p) a:=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
|
||
/- Transport and the groupoid structure of paths -/
|
||
|
||
definition tr_idp (P : A → Type) {x : A} (u : P x) :
|
||
idp ▹ u = u := idp
|
||
|
||
definition tr_con (P : A → Type) {x y z : A} (p : x = y) (q : y = z) (u : P x) :
|
||
p ⬝ q ▹ u = q ▹ p ▹ u :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q (eq.rec_on p idp)
|
||
|
||
definition tr_inv_tr (P : A → Type) {x y : A} (p : x = y) (z : P y) :
|
||
p ▹ p⁻¹ ▹ z = z :=
|
||
(tr_con P (p⁻¹) p z)⁻¹ ⬝ ap (λr, transport P r z) (con.right_inv p)
|
||
|
||
definition inv_tr_tr (P : A → Type) {x y : A} (p : x = y) (z : P x) :
|
||
p⁻¹ ▹ p ▹ z = z :=
|
||
(tr_con P p (p⁻¹) z)⁻¹ ⬝ ap (λr, transport P r z) (con.left_inv p)
|
||
|
||
definition tr_con_lemma (P : A → Type)
|
||
{x y z w : A} (p : x = y) (q : y = z) (r : z = w) (u : P x) :
|
||
ap (λe, e ▹ u) (con.assoc' p q r) ⬝ (tr_con P (p ⬝ q) r u) ⬝
|
||
ap (transport P r) (tr_con P p q u)
|
||
= (tr_con P p (q ⬝ r) u) ⬝ (tr_con P q r (p ▹ u))
|
||
:> ((p ⬝ (q ⬝ r)) ▹ u = r ▹ q ▹ p ▹ u) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on r (eq.rec_on q (eq.rec_on p idp))
|
||
|
||
-- Here is another coherence lemma for transport.
|
||
definition tr_inv_tr_lemma (P : A → Type) {x y : A} (p : x = y) (z : P x) :
|
||
tr_inv_tr P p (transport P p z) = ap (transport P p) (inv_tr_tr P p z) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
-- Dependent transport in a doubly dependent type.
|
||
-- should P, Q and y all be explicit here?
|
||
definition transportD (P : A → Type) (Q : Π a : A, P a → Type)
|
||
{a a' : A} (p : a = a') (b : P a) (z : Q a b) : Q a' (p ▹ b) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p z
|
||
-- In Coq the variables B, C and y are explicit, but in Lean we can probably have them implicit using the following notation
|
||
notation p `▹D`:65 x:64 := transportD _ _ p _ x
|
||
|
||
-- Transporting along higher-dimensional paths
|
||
definition transport2 (P : A → Type) {x y : A} {p q : x = y} (r : p = q) (z : P x) :
|
||
p ▹ z = q ▹ z :=
|
||
ap (λp', p' ▹ z) r
|
||
|
||
notation p `▹2`:65 x:64 := transport2 _ p _ x
|
||
|
||
-- An alternative definition.
|
||
definition tr2_eq_ap10 (Q : A → Type) {x y : A} {p q : x = y} (r : p = q)
|
||
(z : Q x) :
|
||
transport2 Q r z = ap10 (ap (transport Q) r) z :=
|
||
eq.rec_on r idp
|
||
|
||
definition tr2_con (P : A → Type) {x y : A} {p1 p2 p3 : x = y}
|
||
(r1 : p1 = p2) (r2 : p2 = p3) (z : P x) :
|
||
transport2 P (r1 ⬝ r2) z = transport2 P r1 z ⬝ transport2 P r2 z :=
|
||
eq.rec_on r1 (eq.rec_on r2 idp)
|
||
|
||
definition tr2_inv (Q : A → Type) {x y : A} {p q : x = y} (r : p = q) (z : Q x) :
|
||
transport2 Q (r⁻¹) z = ((transport2 Q r z)⁻¹) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on r idp
|
||
|
||
definition transportD2 (B C : A → Type) (D : Π(a:A), B a → C a → Type)
|
||
{x1 x2 : A} (p : x1 = x2) (y : B x1) (z : C x1) (w : D x1 y z) : D x2 (p ▹ y) (p ▹ z) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p w
|
||
|
||
notation p `▹D2`:65 x:64 := transportD2 _ _ _ p _ _ x
|
||
|
||
definition ap_tr_con_tr2 (P : A → Type) {x y : A} {p q : x = y} {z w : P x} (r : p = q)
|
||
(s : z = w) :
|
||
ap (transport P p) s ⬝ transport2 P r w = transport2 P r z ⬝ ap (transport P q) s :=
|
||
eq.rec_on r (con_idp _ ⬝ (idp_con _)⁻¹)
|
||
|
||
|
||
definition fn_tr_eq_tr_fn {P Q : A → Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) (f : Πx, P x → Q x) (z : P x) :
|
||
f y (p ▹ z) = (p ▹ (f x z)) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
/- Transporting in particular fibrations -/
|
||
|
||
/-
|
||
From the Coq HoTT library:
|
||
|
||
One frequently needs lemmas showing that transport in a certain dependent type is equal to some
|
||
more explicitly defined operation, defined according to the structure of that dependent type.
|
||
For most dependent types, we prove these lemmas in the appropriate file in the types/
|
||
subdirectory. Here we consider only the most basic cases.
|
||
-/
|
||
|
||
-- Transporting in a constant fibration.
|
||
definition tr_constant (p : x = y) (z : B) : transport (λx, B) p z = z :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
definition tr2_constant {p q : x = y} (r : p = q) (z : B) :
|
||
tr_constant p z = transport2 (λu, B) r z ⬝ tr_constant q z :=
|
||
eq.rec_on r (idp_con _)⁻¹
|
||
|
||
-- Transporting in a pulled back fibration.
|
||
-- TODO: P can probably be implicit
|
||
definition transport_compose (P : B → Type) (f : A → B) (p : x = y) (z : P (f x)) :
|
||
transport (P ∘ f) p z = transport P (ap f p) z :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
definition ap_precompose (f : A → B) (g g' : B → C) (p : g = g') :
|
||
ap (λh, h ∘ f) p = transport (λh : B → C, g ∘ f = h ∘ f) p idp :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
definition apD10_ap_precompose (f : A → B) (g g' : B → C) (p : g = g') (a : A) :
|
||
apD10 (ap (λh : B → C, h ∘ f) p) a = apD10 p (f a) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
definition apD10_ap_postcompose (f : B → C) (g g' : A → B) (p : g = g') (a : A) :
|
||
apD10 (ap (λh : A → B, f ∘ h) p) a = ap f (apD10 p a) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
-- A special case of [transport_compose] which seems to come up a lot.
|
||
definition tr_eq_tr_id_ap (P : A → Type) x y (p : x = y) (u : P x) :
|
||
transport P p u = transport id (ap P p) u :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
|
||
/- The behavior of [ap] and [apD] -/
|
||
|
||
-- In a constant fibration, [apD] reduces to [ap], modulo [transport_const].
|
||
definition apD_eq_tr_constant_con_ap (f : A → B) (p: x = y) :
|
||
apD f p = tr_constant p (f x) ⬝ ap f p :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p idp
|
||
|
||
|
||
/- The 2-dimensional groupoid structure -/
|
||
|
||
-- Horizontal composition of 2-dimensional paths.
|
||
definition concat2 {p p' : x = y} {q q' : y = z} (h : p = p') (h' : q = q') :
|
||
p ⬝ q = p' ⬝ q' :=
|
||
eq.rec_on h (eq.rec_on h' idp)
|
||
|
||
infixl `◾`:75 := concat2
|
||
|
||
-- 2-dimensional path inversion
|
||
definition inverse2 {p q : x = y} (h : p = q) : p⁻¹ = q⁻¹ :=
|
||
eq.rec_on h idp
|
||
|
||
|
||
/- Whiskering -/
|
||
|
||
definition whisker_left (p : x = y) {q r : y = z} (h : q = r) : p ⬝ q = p ⬝ r :=
|
||
idp ◾ h
|
||
|
||
definition whisker_right {p q : x = y} (h : p = q) (r : y = z) : p ⬝ r = q ⬝ r :=
|
||
h ◾ idp
|
||
|
||
-- Unwhiskering, a.k.a. cancelling
|
||
|
||
definition cancel_left {x y z : A} (p : x = y) (q r : y = z) : (p ⬝ q = p ⬝ r) → (q = r) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on p (λq r s, !idp_con⁻¹ ⬝ s ⬝ !idp_con) q r
|
||
|
||
definition cancel_right {x y z : A} (p q : x = y) (r : y = z) : (p ⬝ r = q ⬝ r) → (p = q) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on r (λs, !con_idp⁻¹ ⬝ s ⬝ !con_idp)
|
||
|
||
-- Whiskering and identity paths.
|
||
|
||
definition whisker_right_idp_right {p q : x = y} (h : p = q) :
|
||
(con_idp p)⁻¹ ⬝ whisker_right h idp ⬝ con_idp q = h :=
|
||
eq.rec_on h (eq.rec_on p idp)
|
||
|
||
definition whisker_right_idp_left (p : x = y) (q : y = z) :
|
||
whisker_right idp q = idp :> (p ⬝ q = p ⬝ q) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q idp
|
||
|
||
definition whisker_left_idp_right (p : x = y) (q : y = z) :
|
||
whisker_left p idp = idp :> (p ⬝ q = p ⬝ q) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q idp
|
||
|
||
definition whisker_left_idp_left {p q : x = y} (h : p = q) :
|
||
(idp_con p) ⁻¹ ⬝ whisker_left idp h ⬝ idp_con q = h :=
|
||
eq.rec_on h (eq.rec_on p idp)
|
||
|
||
definition con2_idp {p q : x = y} (h : p = q) :
|
||
h ◾ idp = whisker_right h idp :> (p ⬝ idp = q ⬝ idp) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on h idp
|
||
|
||
definition idp_con2 {p q : x = y} (h : p = q) :
|
||
idp ◾ h = whisker_left idp h :> (idp ⬝ p = idp ⬝ q) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on h idp
|
||
|
||
-- The interchange law for concatenation.
|
||
definition con2_con_con2 {p p' p'' : x = y} {q q' q'' : y = z}
|
||
(a : p = p') (b : p' = p'') (c : q = q') (d : q' = q'') :
|
||
(a ◾ c) ⬝ (b ◾ d) = (a ⬝ b) ◾ (c ⬝ d) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on d (eq.rec_on c (eq.rec_on b (eq.rec_on a idp)))
|
||
|
||
definition whisker_right_con_whisker_left {x y z : A} (p p' : x = y) (q q' : y = z) (a : p = p') (b : q = q') :
|
||
(whisker_right a q) ⬝ (whisker_left p' b) = (whisker_left p b) ⬝ (whisker_right a q') :=
|
||
eq.rec_on b (eq.rec_on a (idp_con _)⁻¹)
|
||
|
||
-- Structure corresponding to the coherence equations of a bicategory.
|
||
|
||
-- The "pentagonator": the 3-cell witnessing the associativity pentagon.
|
||
definition pentagon {v w x y z : A} (p : v = w) (q : w = x) (r : x = y) (s : y = z) :
|
||
whisker_left p (con.assoc' q r s)
|
||
⬝ con.assoc' p (q ⬝ r) s
|
||
⬝ whisker_right (con.assoc' p q r) s
|
||
= con.assoc' p q (r ⬝ s) ⬝ con.assoc' (p ⬝ q) r s :=
|
||
eq.rec_on s (eq.rec_on r (eq.rec_on q (eq.rec_on p idp)))
|
||
|
||
-- The 3-cell witnessing the left unit triangle.
|
||
definition triangulator (p : x = y) (q : y = z) :
|
||
con.assoc' p idp q ⬝ whisker_right (con_idp p) q = whisker_left p (idp_con q) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on q (eq.rec_on p idp)
|
||
|
||
definition eckmann_hilton {x:A} (p q : idp = idp :> (x = x)) : p ⬝ q = q ⬝ p :=
|
||
(!whisker_right_idp_right ◾ !whisker_left_idp_left)⁻¹
|
||
⬝ (!con_idp ◾ !con_idp)
|
||
⬝ (!idp_con ◾ !idp_con)
|
||
⬝ !whisker_right_con_whisker_left
|
||
⬝ (!idp_con ◾ !idp_con)⁻¹
|
||
⬝ (!con_idp ◾ !con_idp)⁻¹
|
||
⬝ (!whisker_left_idp_left ◾ !whisker_right_idp_right)
|
||
|
||
-- The action of functions on 2-dimensional paths
|
||
definition ap02 (f:A → B) {x y : A} {p q : x = y} (r : p = q) : ap f p = ap f q :=
|
||
eq.rec_on r idp
|
||
|
||
definition ap02_con (f : A → B) {x y : A} {p p' p'' : x = y} (r : p = p') (r' : p' = p'') :
|
||
ap02 f (r ⬝ r') = ap02 f r ⬝ ap02 f r' :=
|
||
eq.rec_on r (eq.rec_on r' idp)
|
||
|
||
definition ap02_con2 (f : A → B) {x y z : A} {p p' : x = y} {q q' :y = z} (r : p = p')
|
||
(s : q = q') :
|
||
ap02 f (r ◾ s) = ap_con f p q
|
||
⬝ (ap02 f r ◾ ap02 f s)
|
||
⬝ (ap_con f p' q')⁻¹ :=
|
||
eq.rec_on r (eq.rec_on s (eq.rec_on q (eq.rec_on p idp)))
|
||
-- eq.rec_on r (eq.rec_on s (eq.rec_on p (eq.rec_on q idp)))
|
||
|
||
definition apD02 {p q : x = y} (f : Π x, P x) (r : p = q) :
|
||
apD f p = transport2 P r (f x) ⬝ apD f q :=
|
||
eq.rec_on r (idp_con _)⁻¹
|
||
|
||
-- And now for a lemma whose statement is much longer than its proof.
|
||
definition apD02_con (P : A → Type) (f : Π x:A, P x) {x y : A}
|
||
{p1 p2 p3 : x = y} (r1 : p1 = p2) (r2 : p2 = p3) :
|
||
apD02 f (r1 ⬝ r2) = apD02 f r1
|
||
⬝ whisker_left (transport2 P r1 (f x)) (apD02 f r2)
|
||
⬝ con.assoc' _ _ _
|
||
⬝ (whisker_right ((tr2_con P r1 r2 (f x))⁻¹) (apD f p3)) :=
|
||
eq.rec_on r2 (eq.rec_on r1 (eq.rec_on p1 idp))
|
||
end eq
|
||
|
||
namespace eq
|
||
section
|
||
variables {A B C D E : Type} {a a' : A} {b b' : B} {c c' : C} {d d' : D}
|
||
|
||
definition ap011 (f : A → B → C) (Ha : a = a') (Hb : b = b') : f a b = f a' b' :=
|
||
eq.rec_on Ha (eq.rec_on Hb idp)
|
||
|
||
definition ap0111 (f : A → B → C → D) (Ha : a = a') (Hb : b = b') (Hc : c = c')
|
||
: f a b c = f a' b' c' :=
|
||
eq.rec_on Ha (ap011 (f a) Hb Hc)
|
||
|
||
definition ap01111 (f : A → B → C → D → E) (Ha : a = a') (Hb : b = b') (Hc : c = c') (Hd : d = d')
|
||
: f a b c d = f a' b' c' d' :=
|
||
eq.rec_on Ha (ap0111 (f a) Hb Hc Hd)
|
||
end
|
||
section
|
||
variables {A : Type} {B : A → Type} {C : Πa, B a → Type} {D : Πa b, C a b → Type}
|
||
{E : Πa b c, D a b c → Type} {F : Type}
|
||
variables {a a' : A}
|
||
{b : B a} {b' : B a'}
|
||
{c : C a b} {c' : C a' b'}
|
||
{d : D a b c} {d' : D a' b' c'}
|
||
|
||
definition apD011 (f : Πa, B a → F) (Ha : a = a') (Hb : (Ha ▹ b) = b')
|
||
: f a b = f a' b' :=
|
||
eq.rec_on Hb (eq.rec_on Ha idp)
|
||
|
||
definition apD0111 (f : Πa b, C a b → F) (Ha : a = a') (Hb : (Ha ▹ b) = b')
|
||
(Hc : apD011 C Ha Hb ▹ c = c')
|
||
: f a b c = f a' b' c' :=
|
||
eq.rec_on Hc (eq.rec_on Hb (eq.rec_on Ha idp))
|
||
|
||
definition apD01111 (f : Πa b c, D a b c → F) (Ha : a = a') (Hb : (Ha ▹ b) = b')
|
||
(Hc : apD011 C Ha Hb ▹ c = c') (Hd : apD0111 D Ha Hb Hc ▹ d = d')
|
||
: f a b c d = f a' b' c' d' :=
|
||
eq.rec_on Hd (eq.rec_on Hc (eq.rec_on Hb (eq.rec_on Ha idp)))
|
||
end
|
||
end eq
|