Define LES #25

Open
opened 2024-10-10 06:17:19 +00:00 by michael · 3 comments
Owner
  • Step 1 (#40): Define the fiber sequence of f
  • Step 2: Show that this sequence is equivalent to a sequence involving iterated loop spaces
  • Step 3: Fix negation signs in the exact sequence
  • Step 4: Index the sequence over \mathbb{N} \times \mathsf{fin}_3
  • Step 5: 0-truncate the sequence to obtain the sequence in 4.1.1
- [ ] Step 1 (#40): Define the fiber sequence of $f$ - [ ] Step 2: Show that this sequence is equivalent to a sequence involving iterated loop spaces - [ ] Step 3: Fix negation signs in the exact sequence - [ ] Step 4: Index the sequence over $\mathbb{N} \times \mathsf{fin}_3$ - [ ] Step 5: 0-truncate the sequence to obtain the sequence in 4.1.1
michael added this to the research project 2024-10-10 06:28:22 +00:00
Author
Owner

Currently trying to define \mathsf{h1}_n : \Omega^n(X) \rightarrow \Omega^n(Y)

Currently trying to define $\mathsf{h1}_n : \Omega^n(X) \rightarrow \Omega^n(Y)$
Author
Owner

Still many warnings left tho

warning: -W[no]UnsupportedIndexedMatch
This clause uses pattern-matching features that are not yet
supported by Cubical Agda, the function to which it belongs will
not compute when applied to transports.
Reason: It relies on injectivity of the data constructor suc, which
        is not yet supported
when checking the definition of LES-edge

also need to figure out why expressions like (Ω^ n) (F , x , f-eq) .snd don't simplify

Still many warnings left tho ``` warning: -W[no]UnsupportedIndexedMatch This clause uses pattern-matching features that are not yet supported by Cubical Agda, the function to which it belongs will not compute when applied to transports. Reason: It relies on injectivity of the data constructor suc, which is not yet supported when checking the definition of LES-edge ``` also need to figure out why expressions like `(Ω^ n) (F , x , f-eq) .snd` don't simplify
Author
Owner

This makes me wonder if my current definition of LES is the best possible one. This might change later on...

This makes me wonder if my current definition of LES is the best possible one. This might change later on...
michael reopened this issue 2024-10-16 06:36:28 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: michael/type-theory#25
No description provided.