Spectral/homotopy/susp.hlean

import .pushout types.pointed2 ..move_to_lib

open susp eq pointed function is_equiv lift equiv is_trunc nat

namespace susp
  variables {X X' Y Y' Z : Type*}

  definition iterate_susp_iterate_susp_rev (n m : ℕ) (A : Type*) :
    iterate_susp n (iterate_susp m A) ≃* iterate_susp (m + n) A :=
  begin
    induction n with n e,
    { reflexivity },
    { exact susp_pequiv e }
  end

  definition iterate_susp_pequiv [constructor] (n : ℕ) {X Y : Type*} (f : X ≃* Y) :
    iterate_susp n X ≃* iterate_susp n Y :=
  begin
    induction n with n e,
    { exact f },
    { exact susp_pequiv e }
  end

  open algebra nat
  definition iterate_susp_iterate_susp (n m : ℕ) (A : Type*) :
    iterate_susp n (iterate_susp m A) ≃* iterate_susp (n + m) A :=
  iterate_susp_iterate_susp_rev n m A ⬝e* pequiv_of_eq (ap (λk, iterate_susp k A) (add.comm m n))

  definition plift_susp.{u v} : Π(A : Type*), plift.{u v} (susp A) ≃* susp (plift.{u v} A) :=
  begin
    intro A,
    calc
      plift.{u v} (susp A) ≃* susp A               : by exact (pequiv_plift (susp A))⁻¹ᵉ*
                        ... ≃* susp (plift.{u v} A) : by exact susp_pequiv (pequiv_plift.{u v} A)
  end

  definition is_contr_susp [instance] (A : Type) [H : is_contr A] : is_contr (susp A) :=
  begin
    apply is_contr.mk north,
    intro x, induction x,
    reflexivity,
    exact merid !center,
    apply eq_pathover_constant_left_id_right, apply square_of_eq,
    exact whisker_left idp (ap merid !eq_of_is_contr)
  end

  definition loop_susp_pintro_phomotopy {X Y : Type*} {f g : ⅀ X →* Y} (p : f ~* g) :
    loop_susp_pintro X Y f ~* loop_susp_pintro X Y g :=
  pwhisker_right (loop_susp_unit X) (Ω⇒ p)

  variables {A₀₀ A₂₀ A₀₂ A₂₂ : Type*}
            {f₁₀ : A₀₀ →* A₂₀} {f₁₂ : A₀₂ →* A₂₂}
            {f₀₁ : A₀₀ →* A₀₂} {f₂₁ : A₂₀ →* A₂₂}

  -- rename: susp_functor_psquare
  definition suspend_psquare (p : psquare f₁₀ f₁₂ f₀₁ f₂₁) : psquare (⅀→ f₁₀) (⅀→ f₁₂) (⅀→ f₀₁) (⅀→ f₂₁) :=
sorry

  definition susp_to_loop_psquare (f₁₀ : A₀₀ →* A₂₀) (f₁₂ : A₀₂ →* A₂₂) (f₀₁ : susp A₀₀ →* A₀₂) (f₂₁ : susp A₂₀ →* A₂₂) : (psquare (⅀→ f₁₀) f₁₂ f₀₁ f₂₁) → (psquare f₁₀ (Ω→ f₁₂) ((loop_susp_pintro A₀₀ A₀₂) f₀₁) ((loop_susp_pintro A₂₀ A₂₂) f₂₁)) :=
  begin
    intro p,
    refine pvconcat _ (ap1_psquare p),
    exact loop_susp_unit_natural f₁₀
  end

  definition loop_to_susp_square (f₁₀ : A₀₀ →* A₂₀) (f₁₂ : A₀₂ →* A₂₂) (f₀₁ : A₀₀ →* Ω A₀₂) (f₂₁ : A₂₀ →* Ω A₂₂) : (psquare f₁₀ (Ω→ f₁₂) f₀₁ f₂₁) → (psquare (⅀→ f₁₀) f₁₂ ((susp_pelim A₀₀ A₀₂) f₀₁) ((susp_pelim A₂₀ A₂₂) f₂₁)) :=
  begin
    intro p,
    refine pvconcat (suspend_psquare p) _,
    exact psquare_transpose (loop_susp_counit_natural f₁₂)
  end

  open pushout unit prod sigma sigma.ops

  section
    parameters {A : Type*} {n : ℕ} [HA : is_conn n A]

    -- we end up not using this, because to prove that the
    -- composition with the first projection is loop_susp_counit A
    -- is hideous without HIT computations on path constructors
    parameter (A)
    definition pullback_diagonal_prod_of_wedge : susp (Ω A)
      ≃ Σ (a : A) (w : wedge A A), prod_of_wedge w = (a, a) :=
    begin
      refine equiv.trans _
        (comm_equiv_unc (λ z, prod_of_wedge (prod.pr1 z) = (prod.pr2 z, prod.pr2 z))),
      apply equiv.symm,
      apply equiv.trans (sigma_equiv_sigma_right
        (λ w, sigma_equiv_sigma_right
          (λ a, prod_eq_equiv (prod_of_wedge w) (a, a)))),
      apply equiv.trans !pushout.flattening', esimp,
      fapply pushout.equiv
        (λ z, ⟨pt, z.2⟩) (λ z, ⟨pt, glue z.1 ▸ z.2⟩) (λ p, star) (λ p, star),
      { apply equiv.trans !sigma_unit_left, fapply equiv.MK,
        { intro z, induction z with a w, induction w with p q, exact p ⬝ q⁻¹ },
        { intro p, exact ⟨pt, (p, idp)⟩ },
        { intro p, reflexivity },
        { intro z, induction z with a w, induction w with p q, induction q,
          reflexivity } },
      { fapply equiv.MK,
        { intro z, exact star },
        { intro u, exact ⟨pt, ⟨pt, (idp, idp)⟩ ⟩ },
        { intro u, induction u, reflexivity },
        { intro z, induction z with a w, induction w with b z,
          induction z with p q, induction p, esimp at q, induction q,
          reflexivity } },
      { fapply equiv.MK,
        { intro z, exact star },
        { intro u, exact ⟨pt, ⟨pt, (idp, idp)⟩ ⟩ },
        { intro u, induction u, reflexivity },
        { intro z, induction z with a w, induction w with b z,
          induction z with p q, induction q, esimp at p, induction p,
          reflexivity } },
      { intro z, induction z with u w, induction u, induction w with a z,
        induction z with p q, reflexivity },
      { intro z, induction z with u w, induction u, induction w with a z,
        induction z with p q, reflexivity }
    end

    parameter {A}
    -- instead we directly compare the fibers, using flattening twice
    definition fiber_loop_susp_counit_equiv (a : A)
      : fiber (loop_susp_counit A) a ≃ fiber prod_of_wedge (a, a) :=
    begin
      apply equiv.trans !fiber.sigma_char, apply equiv.trans !pushout.flattening',
      apply equiv.symm, apply equiv.trans !fiber.sigma_char,
      apply equiv.trans (sigma_equiv_sigma_right
        (λ w, prod_eq_equiv (prod_of_wedge w) (a, a))), esimp,
      apply equiv.trans !pushout.flattening',
      esimp,
      fapply pushout.equiv (λ z, ⟨pt, z.2⟩) (λ z, ⟨pt, glue z.1 ▸ z.2⟩)
        (λ z, ⟨star, z.2⟩) (λ z, ⟨star, glue z.1 ▸ z.2⟩),
      { fapply equiv.MK,
        { intro w, induction w with u z, induction z with p q,
          exact ⟨q ⬝ p⁻¹, q⟩ },
        { intro z, induction z with p q, apply dpair star,
          exact (p⁻¹ ⬝ q, q) },
        { intro z, induction z with p q, esimp, induction q, esimp,
          rewrite [idp_con,inv_inv] },
        { intro w, induction w with u z, induction u, induction z with p q,
          esimp, induction q, rewrite [idp_con,inv_inv] } },
      { fapply equiv.MK,
        { intro w, induction w with b z, induction z with p q, exact ⟨star, q⟩ },
        { intro z, induction z with u p, induction u, esimp at p, esimp,
          apply dpair a, esimp, exact (idp, p) },
        { intro z, induction z with u p, induction u, reflexivity },
        { intro w, induction w with b z, induction z with p q, esimp,
          induction p, reflexivity } },
      { fapply equiv.MK,
        { intro w, induction w with b z, induction z with p q, exact ⟨star, p⟩ },
        { intro z, induction z with u p, induction u, esimp at p, esimp,
          apply dpair a, esimp, exact (p, idp) },
        { intro z, induction z with u p, induction u, reflexivity },
        { intro w, induction w with b z, induction z with p q, esimp,
          induction q, reflexivity } },
      { intro w, induction w with u z, induction u, induction z with p q,
        reflexivity },
      { intro w, induction w with u z, induction u, induction z with p q,
        esimp, induction q, esimp, krewrite prod_transport, fapply sigma_eq,
        { exact idp },
        { esimp, rewrite eq_transport_Fl, rewrite eq_transport_Fl,
          krewrite elim_glue, krewrite (ap_compose' pr1 prod_of_wedge (glue star)),
          krewrite elim_glue, esimp, apply eq_pathover, rewrite idp_con, esimp,
          apply square_of_eq, rewrite [idp_con,idp_con,inv_inv] } }
    end

    include HA

    open is_conn trunc_index

    parameter (A)
    -- connectivity of loop_susp_counit
    definition is_conn_fun_loop_susp_counit {k : ℕ} (H : k ≤ 2 * n)
      : is_conn_fun k (loop_susp_counit A) :=
    begin
      intro a, apply is_conn.is_conn_equiv_closed_rev k (fiber_loop_susp_counit_equiv a),
      fapply @is_conn.is_conn_of_le (fiber prod_of_wedge (a, a)) k (2 * n)
        (of_nat_le_of_nat H),
      assert H : of_nat (2 * n) = of_nat n + of_nat n,
      { rewrite (of_nat_add_of_nat n n), apply ap of_nat,
        apply trans (nat.mul_comm 2 n),
        apply ap (λ k, k + n), exact nat.zero_add n },
      rewrite H,
      exact is_conn_fun_prod_of_wedge n n A A (a, a)
    end
  end

end susp