Commit graph

12 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Leonardo de Moura
17c4cce89c fix(library/elaborator): remove_detail procedure was keeping a lot of details when typeof_mvar_justification was being used
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2014-01-07 13:24:46 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
9eb4dc4a81 feat(kernel, library/elaborator, frontends/lean): improve how elaborator_exceptions are displayed in the Lean frontend
This commit affects different modules.
I used the following approach:
1- I store the metavariable environment at unification_failure_justifications. The idea is to capture the set of instantiated metavariables at the time of failure.
2- I added a remove_detail function. It removes propagation steps from the justification tree object. I also remove the backtracking search space associated with higher-order unificiation. I keep only the search related to case-splits due to coercions and overloads.

3- I use the metavariable environment captured at step 1 when pretty printing the justification of an elaborator_exception.

Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2014-01-03 17:18:23 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
2e5e5e187f chore(util/rc): remove unnecessary argument from LEAN_COPY_REF and LEAN_MOVE_REF macros
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-12-13 15:01:24 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
445d4f6793 refactor(kernel/unification_constraint): remove 'null' unification_constraint and its operator bool
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-12-08 18:11:35 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
f80106a895 chore(*): use 'explicit operator bool' everywhere.
operator bool() may produce unwanted conversions.
For example, we had the following bug in the code base.

...
   object const & obj = find_object(const_name(n));
   if (obj && obj.is_builtin() && obj.get_name() == n)
...

obj.get_name() has type lean::name
n              has type lean::expr

Both have 'operator bool()', then the compiler uses the operator to
convert them to Boolean, and then compare the result.
Of course, this is not our intention.

After this commit, the compiler correctly signs the error.
The correct code is

...
   object const & obj = find_object(const_name(n));
   if (obj && obj.is_builtin() && obj.get_name() == const_name(n))
...

Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-12-02 23:02:45 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
412bc792c9 fix(style): missing include
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-10-25 08:10:28 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
0c21f45292 fix(kernel/unification_constraint): memory leak
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-10-25 08:06:21 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
13531b7d3e refactor(kernel): rename trace to justification
Motivations:

- We have been writing several comments of the form "... trace/justification..." and "this trace object justify ...".
- Avoid confusion with util/trace.h

Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-10-23 13:42:17 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
a1710aeeb9 feat(elaborator): add trace objects for elaborator
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-10-22 08:15:36 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
dc0e7a4472 feat(pos_info_provider): add position information provider for expressions
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-10-22 08:15:36 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
7cf83800c0 refactor(metavar): implement metavar_env, and use unification_constraint and trace objects in the type_checker, light_checker
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-10-22 08:15:36 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
ddb90d3038 feat(kernel): add unification_constraint and trace objects to the kernel
Trace objects will be used to justify steps performed by engines such as the elaborator. We use them to implement non-chronological backtracking in the elaborator. They are also use to justify to the user why something did not work.

The unification constraints are in the kernel because the type checker may create them when type checking a term containing metavariables.

Remark: a minimalistic kernel does not need to include metavariables, unification constraints, nor trace objects. We include these objects in our kernel to minimize code duplication.

Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-10-22 08:15:36 -07:00