lean2/hott/homotopy/connectedness.hlean

563 lines
21 KiB
Text
Raw Normal View History

/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Ulrik Buchholtz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ulrik Buchholtz, Floris van Doorn
Connectedness of types and functions
-/
import types.trunc types.arrow_2 types.lift
open eq is_trunc is_equiv nat equiv trunc function fiber funext pi pointed
definition is_conn [reducible] (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type) : Type :=
is_contr (trunc n A)
definition is_conn_fun [reducible] (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type} (f : A → B) : Type :=
Πb : B, is_conn n (fiber f b)
definition is_conn_inf [reducible] (A : Type) : Type := Πn, is_conn n A
definition is_conn_fun_inf [reducible] {A B : Type} (f : A → B) : Type := Πn, is_conn_fun n f
namespace is_conn
definition is_conn_equiv_closed (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type}
: A ≃ B → is_conn n A → is_conn n B :=
begin
intros H C,
fapply @is_contr_equiv_closed (trunc n A) _,
apply trunc_equiv_trunc,
assumption
end
theorem is_conn_of_le (A : Type) {n k : ℕ₋₂} (H : n ≤ k) [is_conn k A] : is_conn n A :=
begin
apply is_contr_equiv_closed,
apply trunc_trunc_equiv_left _ H
end
theorem is_conn_fun_of_le {A B : Type} (f : A → B) {n k : ℕ₋₂} (H : n ≤ k)
[is_conn_fun k f] : is_conn_fun n f :=
λb, is_conn_of_le _ H
definition is_conn_of_is_conn_succ (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type) [is_conn (n.+1) A] : is_conn n A :=
is_trunc_trunc_of_le A -2 (trunc_index.self_le_succ n)
namespace is_conn_fun
section
parameters (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type} {h : A → B}
(H : is_conn_fun n h) (P : B → Type) [Πb, is_trunc n (P b)]
private definition rec.helper : (Πa : A, P (h a)) → Πb : B, trunc n (fiber h b) → P b :=
λt b, trunc.rec (λx, point_eq x ▸ t (point x))
private definition rec.g : (Πa : A, P (h a)) → (Πb : B, P b) :=
λt b, rec.helper t b (@center (trunc n (fiber h b)) (H b))
-- induction principle for n-connected maps (Lemma 7.5.7)
protected definition rec : is_equiv (λs : Πb : B, P b, λa : A, s (h a)) :=
adjointify (λs a, s (h a)) rec.g
begin
intro t, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro a, unfold rec.g, unfold rec.helper,
rewrite [@center_eq _ (H (h a)) (tr (fiber.mk a idp))],
end
begin
intro k, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro b, unfold rec.g,
generalize (@center _ (H b)), apply trunc.rec, apply fiber.rec,
intros a p, induction p, reflexivity
end
protected definition elim : (Πa : A, P (h a)) → (Πb : B, P b) :=
@is_equiv.inv _ _ (λs a, s (h a)) rec
protected definition elim_β : Πf : (Πa : A, P (h a)), Πa : A, elim f (h a) = f a :=
λf, apd10 (@is_equiv.right_inv _ _ (λs a, s (h a)) rec f)
end
section
parameters (n k : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type} {f : A → B}
(H : is_conn_fun n f) (P : B → Type) [HP : Πb, is_trunc (n +2+ k) (P b)]
include H HP
-- Lemma 8.6.1
proposition elim_general : is_trunc_fun k (pi_functor_left f P) :=
begin
revert P HP,
induction k with k IH: intro P HP t,
{ apply is_contr_fiber_of_is_equiv, apply is_conn_fun.rec, exact H, exact HP},
{ apply is_trunc_succ_intro,
intros x y, cases x with g p, cases y with h q,
have e : fiber (λr : g ~ h, (λa, r (f a))) (apd10 (p ⬝ q⁻¹))
≃ (fiber.mk g p = fiber.mk h q
:> fiber (λs : (Πb, P b), (λa, s (f a))) t),
begin
apply equiv.trans !fiber.sigma_char,
have e' : Πr : g ~ h,
((λa, r (f a)) = apd10 (p ⬝ q⁻¹))
≃ (ap (λv, (λa, v (f a))) (eq_of_homotopy r) ⬝ q = p),
begin
intro r,
refine equiv.trans _ (eq_con_inv_equiv_con_eq q p
(ap (λv a, v (f a)) (eq_of_homotopy r))),
rewrite [-(ap (λv a, v (f a)) (apd10_eq_of_homotopy r))],
rewrite [-(apd10_ap_precompose_dependent f (eq_of_homotopy r))],
apply equiv.symm,
apply eq_equiv_fn_eq (@apd10 A (λa, P (f a)) (λa, g (f a)) (λa, h (f a)))
end,
apply equiv.trans (sigma.sigma_equiv_sigma_right e'), clear e',
apply equiv.trans (equiv.symm (sigma.sigma_equiv_sigma_left
eq_equiv_homotopy)),
apply equiv.symm, apply equiv.trans !fiber_eq_equiv,
apply sigma.sigma_equiv_sigma_right, intro r,
apply eq_equiv_eq_symm
end,
apply @is_trunc_equiv_closed _ _ k e, clear e,
apply IH (λb : B, (g b = h b)) (λb, @is_trunc_eq (P b) (n +2+ k) (HP b) (g b) (h b)) }
end
end
section
universe variables u v
parameters (n : ℕ₋₂) {A : Type.{u}} {B : Type.{v}} {h : A → B}
parameter sec : ΠP : B → trunctype.{max u v} n,
is_retraction (λs : (Πb : B, P b), λ a, s (h a))
private definition s := sec (λb, trunctype.mk' n (trunc n (fiber h b)))
include sec
-- the other half of Lemma 7.5.7
definition intro : is_conn_fun n h :=
begin
intro b,
apply is_contr.mk (@is_retraction.sect _ _ _ s (λa, tr (fiber.mk a idp)) b),
esimp, apply trunc.rec, apply fiber.rec, intros a p,
apply transport
(λz : (Σy, h a = y), @sect _ _ _ s (λa, tr (mk a idp)) (sigma.pr1 z) =
tr (fiber.mk a (sigma.pr2 z)))
(@center_eq _ (is_contr_sigma_eq (h a)) (sigma.mk b p)),
exact apd10 (@right_inverse _ _ _ s (λa, tr (fiber.mk a idp))) a
end
end
end is_conn_fun
-- Connectedness is related to maps to and from the unit type, first to
section
parameters (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type)
definition is_conn_of_map_to_unit
: is_conn_fun n (const A unit.star) → is_conn n A :=
begin
intro H, unfold is_conn_fun at H,
exact is_conn_equiv_closed n (fiber.fiber_star_equiv A) _,
end
definition is_conn_fun_to_unit_of_is_conn [H : is_conn n A] :
is_conn_fun n (const A unit.star) :=
begin
intro u, induction u,
exact is_conn_equiv_closed n (fiber.fiber_star_equiv A)⁻¹ᵉ _,
end
-- now maps from unit
definition is_conn_of_map_from_unit (a₀ : A) (H : is_conn_fun n (const unit a₀))
: is_conn n .+1 A :=
is_contr.mk (tr a₀)
begin
apply trunc.rec, intro a,
exact trunc.elim (λz : fiber (const unit a₀) a, ap tr (point_eq z))
(@center _ (H a))
end
definition is_conn_fun_from_unit (a₀ : A) [H : is_conn n .+1 A]
: is_conn_fun n (const unit a₀) :=
begin
intro a,
apply is_conn_equiv_closed n (equiv.symm (fiber_const_equiv A a₀ a)),
apply @is_contr_equiv_closed _ _ (tr_eq_tr_equiv n a₀ a),
end
end
-- as special case we get elimination principles for pointed connected types
namespace is_conn
open pointed unit
section
parameters (n : ℕ₋₂) {A : Type*}
[H : is_conn n .+1 A] (P : A → Type) [Πa, is_trunc n (P a)]
include H
protected definition rec : is_equiv (λs : Πa : A, P a, s (Point A)) :=
@is_equiv_compose
(Πa : A, P a) (unit → P (Point A)) (P (Point A))
(λf, f unit.star) (λs x, s (Point A))
(is_conn_fun.rec n (is_conn_fun_from_unit n A (Point A)) P)
2016-03-01 04:37:03 +00:00
(to_is_equiv (arrow_unit_left (P (Point A))))
protected definition elim : P (Point A) → (Πa : A, P a) :=
@is_equiv.inv _ _ (λs, s (Point A)) rec
protected definition elim_β (p : P (Point A)) : elim p (Point A) = p :=
@is_equiv.right_inv _ _ (λs, s (Point A)) rec p
end
section
parameters (n k : ℕ₋₂) {A : Type*}
[H : is_conn n .+1 A] (P : A → Type) [Πa, is_trunc (n +2+ k) (P a)]
include H
proposition elim_general (p : P (Point A))
: is_trunc k (fiber (λs : (Πa : A, P a), s (Point A)) p) :=
@is_trunc_equiv_closed
(fiber (λs x, s (Point A)) (λx, p))
(fiber (λs, s (Point A)) p)
k
(equiv.symm (fiber.equiv_postcompose _ (arrow_unit_left (P (Point A))) _))
(is_conn_fun.elim_general n k (is_conn_fun_from_unit n A (Point A)) P (λx, p))
end
end is_conn
-- Lemma 7.5.2
definition minus_one_conn_of_surjective {A B : Type} (f : A → B)
: is_surjective f → is_conn_fun -1 f :=
begin
intro H, intro b,
exact @is_contr_of_inhabited_prop (∥fiber f b∥) (is_trunc_trunc -1 (fiber f b)) (H b),
end
definition is_surjection_of_minus_one_conn {A B : Type} (f : A → B)
: is_conn_fun -1 f → is_surjective f :=
begin
intro H, intro b,
exact @center (∥fiber f b∥) (H b),
end
definition merely_of_minus_one_conn {A : Type} : is_conn -1 A → ∥A∥ :=
λH, @center (∥A∥) H
definition minus_one_conn_of_merely {A : Type} : ∥A∥ → is_conn -1 A :=
@is_contr_of_inhabited_prop (∥A∥) (is_trunc_trunc -1 A)
section
open arrow
variables {f g : arrow}
-- Lemma 7.5.4
definition retract_of_conn_is_conn [instance] (r : arrow_hom f g) [H : is_retraction r]
(n : ℕ₋₂) [K : is_conn_fun n f] : is_conn_fun n g :=
begin
intro b, unfold is_conn,
apply is_contr_retract (trunc_functor n (retraction_on_fiber r b)),
exact K (on_cod (arrow.is_retraction.sect r) b)
end
end
-- Corollary 7.5.5
definition is_conn_homotopy (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type} {f g : A → B}
(p : f ~ g) (H : is_conn_fun n f) : is_conn_fun n g :=
@retract_of_conn_is_conn _ _
(arrow.arrow_hom_of_homotopy p) (arrow.is_retraction_arrow_hom_of_homotopy p) n H
-- all types are -2-connected
definition is_conn_minus_two (A : Type) : is_conn -2 A :=
_
-- merely inhabited types are -1-connected
definition is_conn_minus_one (A : Type) (a : ∥ A ∥) : is_conn -1 A :=
is_contr.mk a (is_prop.elim _)
definition is_conn_minus_one_pointed [instance] (A : Type*) : is_conn -1 A :=
is_conn_minus_one A (tr pt)
definition is_conn_trunc [instance] (A : Type) (n k : ℕ₋₂) [H : is_conn n A]
: is_conn n (trunc k A) :=
begin
apply is_trunc_equiv_closed, apply trunc_trunc_equiv_trunc_trunc
end
definition is_conn_eq [instance] (n : ℕ₋₂) {A : Type} (a a' : A) [is_conn (n.+1) A] :
is_conn n (a = a') :=
begin
apply is_trunc_equiv_closed, apply tr_eq_tr_equiv,
end
definition is_conn_loop [instance] (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type*) [is_conn (n.+1) A] : is_conn n (Ω A) :=
!is_conn_eq
open pointed
definition is_conn_ptrunc [instance] (A : Type*) (n k : ℕ₋₂) [H : is_conn n A]
: is_conn n (ptrunc k A) :=
is_conn_trunc A n k
-- the following trivial cases are solved by type class inference
definition is_conn_of_is_contr (k : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type) [is_contr A] : is_conn k A := _
definition is_conn_fun_of_is_equiv (k : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type} (f : A → B) [is_equiv f] :
is_conn_fun k f :=
_
-- Lemma 7.5.14
theorem is_equiv_trunc_functor_of_is_conn_fun [instance] {A B : Type} (n : ℕ₋₂) (f : A → B)
[H : is_conn_fun n f] : is_equiv (trunc_functor n f) :=
begin
fapply adjointify,
{ intro b, induction b with b, exact trunc_functor n point (center (trunc n (fiber f b)))},
{ intro b, induction b with b, esimp, generalize center (trunc n (fiber f b)), intro v,
induction v with v, induction v with a p, esimp, exact ap tr p},
{ intro a, induction a with a, esimp, rewrite [center_eq (tr (fiber.mk a idp))]}
end
theorem trunc_equiv_trunc_of_is_conn_fun {A B : Type} (n : ℕ₋₂) (f : A → B)
[H : is_conn_fun n f] : trunc n A ≃ trunc n B :=
equiv.mk (trunc_functor n f) (is_equiv_trunc_functor_of_is_conn_fun n f)
definition is_conn_fun_trunc_functor_of_le {n k : ℕ₋₂} {A B : Type} (f : A → B) (H : k ≤ n)
[H2 : is_conn_fun k f] : is_conn_fun k (trunc_functor n f) :=
begin
apply is_conn_fun.intro,
intro P, have Πb, is_trunc n (P b), from (λb, is_trunc_of_le _ H),
fconstructor,
{ intro f' b,
induction b with b,
refine is_conn_fun.elim k H2 _ _ b, intro a, exact f' (tr a)},
{ intro f', apply eq_of_homotopy, intro a,
induction a with a, esimp, rewrite [is_conn_fun.elim_β]}
end
definition is_conn_fun_trunc_functor_of_ge {n k : ℕ₋₂} {A B : Type} (f : A → B) (H : n ≤ k)
[H2 : is_conn_fun k f] : is_conn_fun k (trunc_functor n f) :=
begin
apply is_conn_fun_of_is_equiv,
apply is_equiv_trunc_functor_of_le f H
end
-- Exercise 7.18
definition is_conn_fun_trunc_functor {n k : ℕ₋₂} {A B : Type} (f : A → B)
[H2 : is_conn_fun k f] : is_conn_fun k (trunc_functor n f) :=
begin
eapply algebra.le_by_cases k n: intro H,
{ exact is_conn_fun_trunc_functor_of_le f H},
{ exact is_conn_fun_trunc_functor_of_ge f H}
end
open lift
definition is_conn_fun_lift_functor (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type} (f : A → B) [is_conn_fun n f] :
is_conn_fun n (lift_functor f) :=
begin
intro b, cases b with b, apply is_trunc_equiv_closed_rev,
{ apply trunc_equiv_trunc, apply fiber_lift_functor}
end
open trunc_index
definition is_conn_fun_inf.mk_nat {A B : Type} {f : A → B} (H : Π(n : ), is_conn_fun n f)
: is_conn_fun_inf f :=
begin
intro n,
cases n with n, { exact _},
cases n with n, { have -1 ≤ of_nat 0, from dec_star, apply is_conn_fun_of_le f this},
rewrite -of_nat_add_two, exact _
end
definition is_conn_inf.mk_nat {A : Type} (H : Π(n : ), is_conn n A) : is_conn_inf A :=
begin
intro n,
cases n with n, { exact _},
cases n with n, { have -1 ≤ of_nat 0, from dec_star, apply is_conn_of_le A this},
rewrite -of_nat_add_two, exact _
end
definition is_conn_equiv_closed_rev (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type} (f : A ≃ B) (H : is_conn n B) :
is_conn n A :=
is_conn_equiv_closed n f⁻¹ᵉ _
definition is_conn_succ_intro {n : ℕ₋₂} {A : Type} (a : trunc (n.+1) A)
(H2 : Π(a a' : A), is_conn n (a = a')) : is_conn (n.+1) A :=
begin
apply @is_contr_of_inhabited_prop,
{ apply is_trunc_succ_intro,
refine trunc.rec _, intro a, refine trunc.rec _, intro a',
apply is_contr_equiv_closed !tr_eq_tr_equiv⁻¹ᵉ },
exact a
end
definition is_conn_pathover (n : ℕ₋₂) {A : Type} {B : A → Type} {a a' : A} (p : a = a') (b : B a)
(b' : B a') [is_conn (n.+1) (B a')] : is_conn n (b =[p] b') :=
is_conn_equiv_closed_rev n !pathover_equiv_tr_eq _
open sigma
lemma is_conn_sigma [instance] {A : Type} (B : A → Type) (n : ℕ₋₂)
[HA : is_conn n A] [HB : Πa, is_conn n (B a)] : is_conn n (Σa, B a) :=
begin
revert A B HA HB, induction n with n IH: intro A B HA HB,
{ apply is_conn_minus_two },
apply is_conn_succ_intro,
{ induction center (trunc (n.+1) A) with a, induction center (trunc (n.+1) (B a)) with b,
exact tr ⟨a, b⟩ },
intro a a', refine is_conn_equiv_closed_rev n !sigma_eq_equiv _,
apply IH, apply is_conn_eq, intro p, apply is_conn_pathover
/- an alternative proof of the successor case -/
-- induction center (trunc (n.+1) A) with a₀,
-- induction center (trunc (n.+1) (B a₀)) with b₀,
-- apply is_contr.mk (tr ⟨a₀, b₀⟩),
-- intro ab, induction ab with ab, induction ab with a b,
-- induction tr_eq_tr_equiv n a₀ a !is_prop.elim with p, induction p,
-- induction tr_eq_tr_equiv n b₀ b !is_prop.elim with q, induction q,
-- reflexivity
end
lemma is_conn_prod [instance] (A B : Type) (n : ℕ₋₂) [is_conn n A] [is_conn n B] :
is_conn n (A × B) :=
is_conn_equiv_closed n !sigma.equiv_prod _
lemma is_conn_fun_of_is_conn {A B : Type} (n : ℕ₋₂) (f : A → B)
[HA : is_conn n A] [HB : is_conn (n.+1) B] : is_conn_fun n f :=
λb, is_conn_equiv_closed_rev n !fiber.sigma_char _
lemma is_conn_pfiber {A B : Type*} (n : ℕ₋₂) (f : A →* B)
[HA : is_conn n A] [HB : is_conn (n.+1) B] : is_conn n (pfiber f) :=
is_conn_fun_of_is_conn n f pt
definition is_conn_fun_trunc_elim_of_le {n k : ℕ₋₂} {A B : Type} [is_trunc n B] (f : A → B)
(H : k ≤ n) [H2 : is_conn_fun k f] : is_conn_fun k (trunc.elim f : trunc n A → B) :=
begin
apply is_conn_fun.intro,
intro P, have Πb, is_trunc n (P b), from (λb, is_trunc_of_le _ H),
fconstructor,
{ intro f' b,
refine is_conn_fun.elim k H2 _ _ b, intro a, exact f' (tr a) },
{ intro f', apply eq_of_homotopy, intro a,
induction a with a, esimp, rewrite [is_conn_fun.elim_β] }
end
definition is_conn_fun_trunc_elim_of_ge {n k : ℕ₋₂} {A B : Type} [is_trunc n B] (f : A → B)
(H : n ≤ k) [H2 : is_conn_fun k f] : is_conn_fun k (trunc.elim f : trunc n A → B) :=
begin
apply is_conn_fun_of_is_equiv,
have H3 : is_equiv (trunc_functor k f), from !is_equiv_trunc_functor_of_is_conn_fun,
have H4 : is_equiv (trunc_functor n f), from is_equiv_trunc_functor_of_le _ H,
apply is_equiv_of_equiv_of_homotopy (equiv.mk (trunc_functor n f) _ ⬝e !trunc_equiv),
intro x, induction x, reflexivity
end
definition is_conn_fun_trunc_elim {n k : ℕ₋₂} {A B : Type} [is_trunc n B] (f : A → B)
[H2 : is_conn_fun k f] : is_conn_fun k (trunc.elim f : trunc n A → B) :=
begin
eapply algebra.le_by_cases k n: intro H,
{ exact is_conn_fun_trunc_elim_of_le f H },
{ exact is_conn_fun_trunc_elim_of_ge f H }
end
lemma is_conn_fun_tr (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type) : is_conn_fun n (tr : A → trunc n A) :=
begin
apply is_conn_fun.intro,
intro P,
fconstructor,
{ intro f' b, induction b with a, exact f' a },
{ intro f', reflexivity }
end
definition is_contr_of_is_conn_of_is_trunc {n : ℕ₋₂} {A : Type} (H : is_trunc n A)
(K : is_conn n A) : is_contr A :=
is_contr_equiv_closed (trunc_equiv n A)
definition is_trunc_succ_succ_of_is_trunc_loop (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type*) (H : is_trunc (n.+1) (Ω A))
(H2 : is_conn 0 A) : is_trunc (n.+2) A :=
begin
apply is_trunc_succ_of_is_trunc_loop, apply minus_one_le_succ,
refine is_conn.elim -1 _ _, exact H
end
lemma is_trunc_of_is_trunc_loopn (m n : ) (A : Type*) (H : is_trunc n (Ω[m] A))
(H2 : is_conn (m.-1) A) : is_trunc (m + n) A :=
begin
revert A H H2; induction m with m IH: intro A H H2,
{ rewrite [nat.zero_add], exact H },
rewrite [succ_add],
apply is_trunc_succ_succ_of_is_trunc_loop,
{ apply IH,
{ apply is_trunc_equiv_closed _ !loopn_succ_in },
apply is_conn_loop },
exact is_conn_of_le _ (zero_le_of_nat m)
end
lemma is_trunc_of_is_set_loopn (m : ) (A : Type*) (H : is_set (Ω[m] A))
(H2 : is_conn (m.-1) A) : is_trunc m A :=
is_trunc_of_is_trunc_loopn m 0 A H H2
end is_conn
/-
(bundled) connected types, possibly also truncated or with a point
The notation is n-Type*[k] for k-connected n-truncated pointed types, and you can remove
`n-`, `[k]` or `*` in any combination to remove some conditions
-/
structure conntype (n : ℕ₋₂) : Type :=
(carrier : Type)
(struct : is_conn n carrier)
notation `Type[`:95 n:0 `]`:0 := conntype n
attribute conntype.carrier [coercion]
attribute conntype.struct [instance] [priority 1300]
section
universe variable u
structure pconntype (n : ℕ₋₂) extends conntype.{u} n, pType.{u}
notation `Type*[`:95 n:0 `]`:0 := pconntype n
/-
There are multiple coercions from pconntype to Type. Type class inference doesn't recognize
that all of them are definitionally equal (for performance reasons). One instance is
automatically generated, and we manually add the missing instances.
-/
definition is_conn_pconntype [instance] {n : ℕ₋₂} (X : Type*[n]) : is_conn n X :=
conntype.struct X
structure truncconntype (n k : ℕ₋₂) extends trunctype.{u} n,
conntype.{u} k renaming struct→conn_struct
notation n `-Type[`:95 k:0 `]`:0 := truncconntype n k
definition is_conn_truncconntype [instance] {n k : ℕ₋₂} (X : n-Type[k]) :
is_conn k (truncconntype._trans_of_to_trunctype X) :=
conntype.struct X
definition is_trunc_truncconntype [instance] {n k : ℕ₋₂} (X : n-Type[k]) : is_trunc n X :=
trunctype.struct X
structure ptruncconntype (n k : ℕ₋₂) extends ptrunctype.{u} n,
pconntype.{u} k renaming struct→conn_struct
notation n `-Type*[`:95 k:0 `]`:0 := ptruncconntype n k
attribute ptruncconntype._trans_of_to_pconntype ptruncconntype._trans_of_to_ptrunctype
ptruncconntype._trans_of_to_pconntype_1 ptruncconntype._trans_of_to_ptrunctype_1
ptruncconntype._trans_of_to_pconntype_2 ptruncconntype._trans_of_to_ptrunctype_2
ptruncconntype.to_pconntype ptruncconntype.to_ptrunctype
truncconntype._trans_of_to_conntype truncconntype._trans_of_to_trunctype
truncconntype.to_conntype truncconntype.to_trunctype [unfold 3]
attribute pconntype._trans_of_to_conntype pconntype._trans_of_to_pType
pconntype.to_pType pconntype.to_conntype [unfold 2]
definition is_conn_ptruncconntype [instance] {n k : ℕ₋₂} (X : n-Type*[k]) :
is_conn k (ptruncconntype._trans_of_to_ptrunctype X) :=
conntype.struct X
definition is_trunc_ptruncconntype [instance] {n k : ℕ₋₂} (X : n-Type*[k]) :
is_trunc n (ptruncconntype._trans_of_to_pconntype X) :=
trunctype.struct X
definition ptruncconntype_eq {n k : ℕ₋₂} {X Y : n-Type*[k]} (p : X ≃* Y) : X = Y :=
begin
induction X with X Xt Xp Xc, induction Y with Y Yt Yp Yc,
note q := pType_eq_elim (eq_of_pequiv p),
cases q with r s, esimp at *, induction r,
exact ap0111 (ptruncconntype.mk X) !is_prop.elim (eq_of_pathover_idp s) !is_prop.elim
end
end