2015-04-10 12:19:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
/-
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright (c) 2015 Leonardo de Moura. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
|
|
|
|
|
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-10 07:44:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
List combinators.
|
2015-04-10 12:19:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
-/
|
|
|
|
|
import data.list.basic
|
|
|
|
|
open nat prod decidable function helper_tactics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace list
|
|
|
|
|
variables {A B C : Type}
|
2015-04-12 01:22:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
/- map -/
|
2015-04-10 12:19:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
definition map (f : A → B) : list A → list B
|
|
|
|
|
| [] := []
|
|
|
|
|
| (a :: l) := f a :: map l
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem map_nil (f : A → B) : map f [] = []
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem map_cons (f : A → B) (a : A) (l : list A) : map f (a :: l) = f a :: map f l
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem map_id : ∀ l : list A, map id l = l
|
|
|
|
|
| [] := rfl
|
|
|
|
|
| (x::xs) := begin rewrite [map_cons, map_id] end
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-04 08:51:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
theorem map_id' {f : A → A} (H : ∀x, f x = x) : ∀ l : list A, map f l = l
|
|
|
|
|
| [] := rfl
|
|
|
|
|
| (x::xs) := begin rewrite [map_cons, H, map_id'] end
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-10 12:19:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
theorem map_map (g : B → C) (f : A → B) : ∀ l, map g (map f l) = map (g ∘ f) l
|
|
|
|
|
| [] := rfl
|
|
|
|
|
| (a :: l) :=
|
|
|
|
|
show (g ∘ f) a :: map g (map f l) = map (g ∘ f) (a :: l),
|
|
|
|
|
by rewrite (map_map l)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-04 22:09:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
theorem length_map (f : A → B) : ∀ l : list A, length (map f l) = length l
|
2015-04-10 12:19:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
| [] := by esimp
|
|
|
|
|
| (a :: l) :=
|
|
|
|
|
show length (map f l) + 1 = length l + 1,
|
2015-06-04 22:09:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
by rewrite (length_map l)
|
2015-04-10 12:19:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem mem_map {A B : Type} (f : A → B) : ∀ {a l}, a ∈ l → f a ∈ map f l
|
|
|
|
|
| a [] i := absurd i !not_mem_nil
|
|
|
|
|
| a (x::xs) i := or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons i)
|
|
|
|
|
(λ aeqx : a = x, by rewrite [aeqx, map_cons]; apply mem_cons)
|
|
|
|
|
(λ ainxs : a ∈ xs, or.inr (mem_map ainxs))
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-10 07:44:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
theorem exists_of_mem_map {A B : Type} {f : A → B} {b : B} :
|
|
|
|
|
∀{l}, b ∈ map f l → ∃a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b
|
|
|
|
|
| [] H := false.elim H
|
|
|
|
|
| (c::l) H := or.elim (iff.mp !mem_cons_iff H)
|
|
|
|
|
(assume H1 : b = f c,
|
|
|
|
|
exists.intro c (and.intro !mem_cons (eq.symm H1)))
|
|
|
|
|
(assume H1 : b ∈ map f l,
|
2015-05-11 16:14:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
obtain a (Hl : a ∈ l) (Hr : f a = b), from exists_of_mem_map H1,
|
|
|
|
|
exists.intro a (and.intro (mem_cons_of_mem _ Hl) Hr))
|
2015-05-10 07:44:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-11 20:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
theorem eq_of_map_const {A B : Type} {b₁ b₂ : B} : ∀ {l : list A}, b₁ ∈ map (const A b₂) l → b₁ = b₂
|
|
|
|
|
| [] h := absurd h !not_mem_nil
|
|
|
|
|
| (a::l) h :=
|
|
|
|
|
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h)
|
|
|
|
|
(λ b₁eqb₂ : b₁ = b₂, b₁eqb₂)
|
|
|
|
|
(λ b₁inl : b₁ ∈ map (const A b₂) l, eq_of_map_const b₁inl)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-10 12:19:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
definition map₂ (f : A → B → C) : list A → list B → list C
|
|
|
|
|
| [] _ := []
|
|
|
|
|
| _ [] := []
|
|
|
|
|
| (x::xs) (y::ys) := f x y :: map₂ xs ys
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-12 01:22:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
/- filter -/
|
|
|
|
|
definition filter (p : A → Prop) [h : decidable_pred p] : list A → list A
|
|
|
|
|
| [] := []
|
|
|
|
|
| (a::l) := if p a then a :: filter l else filter l
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem filter_nil (p : A → Prop) [h : decidable_pred p] : filter p [] = []
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem filter_cons_of_pos {p : A → Prop} [h : decidable_pred p] {a : A} : ∀ l, p a → filter p (a::l) = a :: filter p l :=
|
|
|
|
|
λ l pa, if_pos pa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem filter_cons_of_neg {p : A → Prop} [h : decidable_pred p] {a : A} : ∀ l, ¬ p a → filter p (a::l) = filter p l :=
|
|
|
|
|
λ l pa, if_neg pa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem of_mem_filter {p : A → Prop} [h : decidable_pred p] {a : A} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ filter p l → p a
|
|
|
|
|
| [] ain := absurd ain !not_mem_nil
|
|
|
|
|
| (b::l) ain := by_cases
|
|
|
|
|
(λ pb : p b,
|
|
|
|
|
have aux : a ∈ b :: filter p l, by rewrite [filter_cons_of_pos _ pb at ain]; exact ain,
|
|
|
|
|
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons aux)
|
|
|
|
|
(λ aeqb : a = b, by rewrite [-aeqb at pb]; exact pb)
|
|
|
|
|
(λ ainl, of_mem_filter ainl))
|
|
|
|
|
(λ npb : ¬ p b, by rewrite [filter_cons_of_neg _ npb at ain]; exact (of_mem_filter ain))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {p : A → Prop} [h : decidable_pred p] {a : A} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ filter p l → a ∈ l
|
|
|
|
|
| [] ain := absurd ain !not_mem_nil
|
|
|
|
|
| (b::l) ain := by_cases
|
|
|
|
|
(λ pb : p b,
|
|
|
|
|
have aux : a ∈ b :: filter p l, by rewrite [filter_cons_of_pos _ pb at ain]; exact ain,
|
|
|
|
|
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons aux)
|
|
|
|
|
(λ aeqb : a = b, by rewrite [aeqb]; exact !mem_cons)
|
|
|
|
|
(λ ainl, mem_cons_of_mem _ (mem_of_mem_filter ainl)))
|
|
|
|
|
(λ npb : ¬ p b, by rewrite [filter_cons_of_neg _ npb at ain]; exact (mem_cons_of_mem _ (mem_of_mem_filter ain)))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {p : A → Prop} [h : decidable_pred p] {a : A} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ l → p a → a ∈ filter p l
|
|
|
|
|
| [] ain pa := absurd ain !not_mem_nil
|
|
|
|
|
| (b::l) ain pa := by_cases
|
|
|
|
|
(λ pb : p b, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ain)
|
|
|
|
|
(λ aeqb : a = b, by rewrite [filter_cons_of_pos _ pb, aeqb]; exact !mem_cons)
|
|
|
|
|
(λ ainl : a ∈ l, by rewrite [filter_cons_of_pos _ pb]; exact (mem_cons_of_mem _ (mem_filter_of_mem ainl pa))))
|
|
|
|
|
(λ npb : ¬ p b, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ain)
|
|
|
|
|
(λ aeqb : a = b, absurd (eq.rec_on aeqb pa) npb)
|
|
|
|
|
(λ ainl : a ∈ l, by rewrite [filter_cons_of_neg _ npb]; exact (mem_filter_of_mem ainl pa)))
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-10 07:44:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
theorem filter_sub {p : A → Prop} [h : decidable_pred p] (l : list A) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
|
2015-04-12 01:22:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
λ a ain, mem_of_mem_filter ain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem filter_append {p : A → Prop} [h : decidable_pred p] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list A), filter p (l₁++l₂) = filter p l₁ ++ filter p l₂
|
|
|
|
|
| [] l₂ := rfl
|
|
|
|
|
| (a::l₁) l₂ := by_cases
|
|
|
|
|
(λ pa : p a, by rewrite [append_cons, *filter_cons_of_pos _ pa, filter_append])
|
|
|
|
|
(λ npa : ¬ p a, by rewrite [append_cons, *filter_cons_of_neg _ npa, filter_append])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/- foldl & foldr -/
|
2015-04-10 12:19:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
definition foldl (f : A → B → A) : A → list B → A
|
|
|
|
|
| a [] := a
|
|
|
|
|
| a (b :: l) := foldl (f a b) l
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem foldl_nil (f : A → B → A) (a : A) : foldl f a [] = a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem foldl_cons (f : A → B → A) (a : A) (b : B) (l : list B) : foldl f a (b::l) = foldl f (f a b) l
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
definition foldr (f : A → B → B) : B → list A → B
|
|
|
|
|
| b [] := b
|
|
|
|
|
| b (a :: l) := f a (foldr b l)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem foldr_nil (f : A → B → B) (b : B) : foldr f b [] = b
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem foldr_cons (f : A → B → B) (b : B) (a : A) (l : list A) : foldr f b (a::l) = f a (foldr f b l)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
section foldl_eq_foldr
|
|
|
|
|
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
|
|
|
|
|
parameters {α : Type} {f : α → α → α}
|
|
|
|
|
hypothesis (Hcomm : ∀ a b, f a b = f b a)
|
|
|
|
|
hypothesis (Hassoc : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f a (f b c))
|
|
|
|
|
include Hcomm Hassoc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b::l) = f b (foldl f a l)
|
|
|
|
|
| a b nil := Hcomm a b
|
|
|
|
|
| a b (c::l) :=
|
|
|
|
|
begin
|
2015-04-29 21:39:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
change foldl f (f (f a b) c) l = f b (foldl f (f a c) l),
|
2015-04-10 12:19:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
rewrite -foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc,
|
2015-04-29 21:39:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
change foldl f (f (f a b) c) l = foldl f (f (f a c) b) l,
|
2015-04-10 12:19:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
have H₁ : f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b, by rewrite [Hassoc, Hassoc, Hcomm b c],
|
|
|
|
|
rewrite H₁
|
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem foldl_eq_foldr : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
|
|
|
|
|
| a nil := rfl
|
|
|
|
|
| a (b :: l) :=
|
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
|
|
|
rewrite foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc,
|
|
|
|
|
esimp,
|
2015-04-29 21:39:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
change f b (foldl f a l) = f b (foldr f a l),
|
2015-04-10 12:19:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
rewrite foldl_eq_foldr
|
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
end foldl_eq_foldr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem foldl_append (f : B → A → B) : ∀ (b : B) (l₁ l₂ : list A), foldl f b (l₁++l₂) = foldl f (foldl f b l₁) l₂
|
|
|
|
|
| b [] l₂ := rfl
|
|
|
|
|
| b (a::l₁) l₂ := by rewrite [append_cons, *foldl_cons, foldl_append]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem foldr_append (f : A → B → B) : ∀ (b : B) (l₁ l₂ : list A), foldr f b (l₁++l₂) = foldr f (foldr f b l₂) l₁
|
|
|
|
|
| b [] l₂ := rfl
|
|
|
|
|
| b (a::l₁) l₂ := by rewrite [append_cons, *foldr_cons, foldr_append]
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-12 01:22:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
/- all & any -/
|
2015-04-10 22:32:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
definition all (l : list A) (p : A → Prop) : Prop :=
|
2015-04-10 12:19:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
foldr (λ a r, p a ∧ r) true l
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-10 22:32:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
definition any (l : list A) (p : A → Prop) : Prop :=
|
2015-04-10 12:19:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
foldr (λ a r, p a ∨ r) false l
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-09 21:33:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
theorem all_nil_eq (p : A → Prop) : all [] p = true
|
2015-04-10 14:01:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-09 21:33:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
theorem all_nil (p : A → Prop) : all [] p := trivial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem all_cons_eq (p : A → Prop) (a : A) (l : list A) : all (a::l) p = (p a ∧ all l p)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem all_cons {p : A → Prop} {a : A} {l : list A} (H1 : p a) (H2 : all l p) : all (a::l) p :=
|
|
|
|
|
and.intro H1 H2
|
2015-04-10 14:01:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-10 22:32:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
theorem all_of_all_cons {p : A → Prop} {a : A} {l : list A} : all (a::l) p → all l p :=
|
2015-05-09 21:33:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
assume h, by rewrite [all_cons_eq at h]; exact (and.elim_right h)
|
2015-04-10 22:32:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem of_all_cons {p : A → Prop} {a : A} {l : list A} : all (a::l) p → p a :=
|
2015-05-09 21:33:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
assume h, by rewrite [all_cons_eq at h]; exact (and.elim_left h)
|
2015-04-10 22:32:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem all_cons_of_all {p : A → Prop} {a : A} {l : list A} : p a → all l p → all (a::l) p :=
|
|
|
|
|
assume pa alllp, and.intro pa alllp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem all_implies {p q : A → Prop} : ∀ {l}, all l p → (∀ x, p x → q x) → all l q
|
|
|
|
|
| [] h₁ h₂ := trivial
|
|
|
|
|
| (a::l) h₁ h₂ :=
|
|
|
|
|
have allq : all l q, from all_implies (all_of_all_cons h₁) h₂,
|
|
|
|
|
have qa : q a, from h₂ a (of_all_cons h₁),
|
|
|
|
|
all_cons_of_all qa allq
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem of_mem_of_all {p : A → Prop} {a : A} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ l → all l p → p a
|
2015-04-10 14:01:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
| [] h₁ h₂ := absurd h₁ !not_mem_nil
|
|
|
|
|
| (b::l) h₁ h₂ :=
|
|
|
|
|
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h₁)
|
|
|
|
|
(λ aeqb : a = b,
|
2015-05-09 21:33:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
by rewrite [all_cons_eq at h₂, -aeqb at h₂]; exact (and.elim_left h₂))
|
2015-04-10 14:01:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(λ ainl : a ∈ l,
|
2015-05-09 21:33:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
have allp : all l p, by rewrite [all_cons_eq at h₂]; exact (and.elim_right h₂),
|
2015-04-10 14:01:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
of_mem_of_all ainl allp)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-09 21:33:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
theorem all_of_forall {p : A → Prop} : ∀ {l}, (∀a, a ∈ l → p a) → all l p
|
|
|
|
|
| [] H := !all_nil
|
|
|
|
|
| (a::l) H := all_cons (H a !mem_cons)
|
|
|
|
|
(all_of_forall (λ a' H', H a' (mem_cons_of_mem _ H')))
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-10 22:32:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
theorem any_nil (p : A → Prop) : any [] p = false
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem any_cons (p : A → Prop) (a : A) (l : list A) : any (a::l) p = (p a ∨ any l p)
|
2015-04-10 14:01:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-09 21:33:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
theorem any_of_mem {p : A → Prop} {a : A} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ l → p a → any l p
|
2015-04-10 22:32:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
| [] i h := absurd i !not_mem_nil
|
|
|
|
|
| (b::l) i h :=
|
|
|
|
|
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons i)
|
|
|
|
|
(λ aeqb : a = b, by rewrite [-aeqb]; exact (or.inl h))
|
|
|
|
|
(λ ainl : a ∈ l,
|
|
|
|
|
have anyl : any l p, from any_of_mem ainl h,
|
|
|
|
|
or.inr anyl)
|
2015-04-10 14:01:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-09 21:33:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
theorem exists_of_any {p : A → Prop} : ∀{l : list A}, any l p → ∃a, a ∈ l ∧ p a
|
|
|
|
|
| [] H := false.elim H
|
|
|
|
|
| (b::l) H := or.elim H
|
|
|
|
|
(assume H1 : p b, exists.intro b (and.intro !mem_cons H1))
|
|
|
|
|
(assume H1 : any l p,
|
2015-05-11 16:14:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
obtain a (H2l : a ∈ l) (H2r : p a), from exists_of_any H1,
|
|
|
|
|
exists.intro a (and.intro (mem_cons_of_mem b H2l) H2r))
|
2015-05-09 21:33:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-10 22:32:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
definition decidable_all (p : A → Prop) [H : decidable_pred p] : ∀ l, decidable (all l p)
|
2015-04-10 12:19:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
| [] := decidable_true
|
|
|
|
|
| (a :: l) :=
|
|
|
|
|
match H a with
|
|
|
|
|
| inl Hp₁ :=
|
|
|
|
|
match decidable_all l with
|
|
|
|
|
| inl Hp₂ := inl (and.intro Hp₁ Hp₂)
|
|
|
|
|
| inr Hn₂ := inr (not_and_of_not_right (p a) Hn₂)
|
|
|
|
|
end
|
2015-04-10 22:32:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
| inr Hn := inr (not_and_of_not_left (all l p) Hn)
|
2015-04-10 12:19:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-10 22:32:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
definition decidable_any (p : A → Prop) [H : decidable_pred p] : ∀ l, decidable (any l p)
|
2015-04-10 12:19:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
| [] := decidable_false
|
|
|
|
|
| (a :: l) :=
|
|
|
|
|
match H a with
|
|
|
|
|
| inl Hp := inl (or.inl Hp)
|
|
|
|
|
| inr Hn₁ :=
|
|
|
|
|
match decidable_any l with
|
|
|
|
|
| inl Hp₂ := inl (or.inr Hp₂)
|
|
|
|
|
| inr Hn₂ := inr (not_or Hn₁ Hn₂)
|
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-12 01:22:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
/- zip & unzip -/
|
2015-04-10 12:19:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
definition zip (l₁ : list A) (l₂ : list B) : list (A × B) :=
|
|
|
|
|
map₂ (λ a b, (a, b)) l₁ l₂
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
definition unzip : list (A × B) → list A × list B
|
|
|
|
|
| [] := ([], [])
|
|
|
|
|
| ((a, b) :: l) :=
|
|
|
|
|
match unzip l with
|
|
|
|
|
| (la, lb) := (a :: la, b :: lb)
|
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem unzip_nil : unzip (@nil (A × B)) = ([], [])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem unzip_cons (a : A) (b : B) (l : list (A × B)) :
|
|
|
|
|
unzip ((a, b) :: l) = match unzip l with (la, lb) := (a :: la, b :: lb) end :=
|
|
|
|
|
rfl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem zip_unzip : ∀ (l : list (A × B)), zip (pr₁ (unzip l)) (pr₂ (unzip l)) = l
|
|
|
|
|
| [] := rfl
|
|
|
|
|
| ((a, b) :: l) :=
|
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
|
|
|
rewrite unzip_cons,
|
|
|
|
|
have r : zip (pr₁ (unzip l)) (pr₂ (unzip l)) = l, from zip_unzip l,
|
|
|
|
|
revert r,
|
2015-05-01 22:07:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
eapply prod.cases_on (unzip l),
|
2015-04-30 18:00:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
intro la lb r,
|
2015-04-10 12:19:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
rewrite -r
|
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/- flat -/
|
|
|
|
|
definition flat (l : list (list A)) : list A :=
|
|
|
|
|
foldl append nil l
|
2015-04-11 20:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-08 04:00:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
/- product -/
|
2015-05-08 03:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
section product
|
2015-04-11 20:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-08 03:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
definition product : list A → list B → list (A × B)
|
2015-04-11 20:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
| [] l₂ := []
|
2015-05-08 03:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
| (a::l₁) l₂ := map (λ b, (a, b)) l₂ ++ product l₁ l₂
|
2015-04-11 20:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-08 03:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
theorem nil_product (l : list B) : product (@nil A) l = []
|
2015-04-11 20:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-08 03:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
theorem product_cons (a : A) (l₁ : list A) (l₂ : list B)
|
|
|
|
|
: product (a::l₁) l₂ = map (λ b, (a, b)) l₂ ++ product l₁ l₂
|
2015-04-11 20:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-08 03:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
theorem product_nil : ∀ (l : list A), product l (@nil B) = []
|
2015-04-11 20:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
| [] := rfl
|
2015-05-08 03:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
| (a::l) := by rewrite [product_cons, map_nil, product_nil]
|
2015-04-11 20:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-11 21:30:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
theorem eq_of_mem_map_pair₁ {a₁ a : A} {b₁ : B} {l : list B} : (a₁, b₁) ∈ map (λ b, (a, b)) l → a₁ = a :=
|
|
|
|
|
assume ain,
|
|
|
|
|
assert h₁ : pr1 (a₁, b₁) ∈ map pr1 (map (λ b, (a, b)) l), from mem_map pr1 ain,
|
|
|
|
|
assert h₂ : a₁ ∈ map (λb, a) l, by rewrite [map_map at h₁, ↑pr1 at h₁]; exact h₁,
|
|
|
|
|
eq_of_map_const h₂
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem mem_of_mem_map_pair₁ {a₁ a : A} {b₁ : B} {l : list B} : (a₁, b₁) ∈ map (λ b, (a, b)) l → b₁ ∈ l :=
|
|
|
|
|
assume ain,
|
|
|
|
|
assert h₁ : pr2 (a₁, b₁) ∈ map pr2 (map (λ b, (a, b)) l), from mem_map pr2 ain,
|
|
|
|
|
assert h₂ : b₁ ∈ map (λx, x) l, by rewrite [map_map at h₁, ↑pr2 at h₁]; exact h₁,
|
|
|
|
|
by rewrite [map_id at h₂]; exact h₂
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-08 03:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
theorem mem_product {a : A} {b : B} : ∀ {l₁ l₂}, a ∈ l₁ → b ∈ l₂ → (a, b) ∈ product l₁ l₂
|
2015-04-11 20:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
| [] l₂ h₁ h₂ := absurd h₁ !not_mem_nil
|
|
|
|
|
| (x::l₁) l₂ h₁ h₂ :=
|
|
|
|
|
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h₁)
|
|
|
|
|
(λ aeqx : a = x,
|
|
|
|
|
assert aux : (a, b) ∈ map (λ b, (a, b)) l₂, from mem_map _ h₂,
|
|
|
|
|
by rewrite [-aeqx]; exact (mem_append_left _ aux))
|
|
|
|
|
(λ ainl₁ : a ∈ l₁,
|
2015-05-08 03:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
have inl₁l₂ : (a, b) ∈ product l₁ l₂, from mem_product ainl₁ h₂,
|
2015-04-11 20:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
mem_append_right _ inl₁l₂)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-08 03:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
theorem mem_of_mem_product_left {a : A} {b : B} : ∀ {l₁ l₂}, (a, b) ∈ product l₁ l₂ → a ∈ l₁
|
2015-04-11 20:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
| [] l₂ h := absurd h !not_mem_nil
|
|
|
|
|
| (x::l₁) l₂ h :=
|
|
|
|
|
or.elim (mem_or_mem_of_mem_append h)
|
|
|
|
|
(λ ain : (a, b) ∈ map (λ b, (x, b)) l₂,
|
2015-04-11 21:30:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
assert aeqx : a = x, from eq_of_mem_map_pair₁ ain,
|
2015-04-11 20:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
by rewrite [aeqx]; exact !mem_cons)
|
2015-05-08 03:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(λ ain : (a, b) ∈ product l₁ l₂,
|
|
|
|
|
have ainl₁ : a ∈ l₁, from mem_of_mem_product_left ain,
|
2015-04-11 20:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
mem_cons_of_mem _ ainl₁)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-08 03:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
theorem mem_of_mem_product_right {a : A} {b : B} : ∀ {l₁ l₂}, (a, b) ∈ product l₁ l₂ → b ∈ l₂
|
2015-04-11 20:52:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
| [] l₂ h := absurd h !not_mem_nil
|
|
|
|
|
| (x::l₁) l₂ h :=
|
|
|
|
|
or.elim (mem_or_mem_of_mem_append h)
|
|
|
|
|
(λ abin : (a, b) ∈ map (λ b, (x, b)) l₂,
|
2015-04-11 21:30:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
mem_of_mem_map_pair₁ abin)
|
2015-05-08 03:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(λ abin : (a, b) ∈ product l₁ l₂,
|
|
|
|
|
mem_of_mem_product_right abin)
|
2015-06-04 22:09:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theorem length_product : ∀ (l₁ : list A) (l₂ : list B), length (product l₁ l₂) = length l₁ * length l₂
|
|
|
|
|
| [] l₂ := by rewrite [length_nil, zero_mul]
|
|
|
|
|
| (x::l₁) l₂ :=
|
|
|
|
|
assert ih : length (product l₁ l₂) = length l₁ * length l₂, from length_product l₁ l₂,
|
|
|
|
|
by rewrite [product_cons, length_append, length_cons,
|
|
|
|
|
length_map, ih, mul.right_distrib, one_mul, add.comm]
|
2015-05-08 03:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
end product
|
2015-04-10 12:19:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
end list
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attribute list.decidable_any [instance]
|
|
|
|
|
attribute list.decidable_all [instance]
|